Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 3. Juli 2019 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> Don't worry about the delay, I'm very happy to merge this now, and have
> an opportunity to backport it in a point release later on. If I got the
> process right, having the changes in master should trigger an update of
> pot/po files by
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Hi Guilhem,
Guilhem Moulin (2019-07-03):
> On Mon, 01 Jul 2019 at 04:45:47 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> > Sure, I even planned to do that when I heard about your post-mini-DebConf
> > “hiccup” ;-) I remained on the road for another 3 weeks and unfortunately
> >
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch pending
Bug #927165 [debian-installer] debian-installer: improve support for LUKS
Added tag(s) patch.
--
927165: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=927165
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Mon, 01 Jul 2019 at 04:45:47 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> Sure, I even planned to do that when I heard about your post-mini-DebConf
> “hiccup” ;-) I remained on the road for another 3 weeks and unfortunately
> didn't find time since the mini Debconf. Thanks for the poke, I'll try to
> tend
Hi there,
On Mon, 01 Jul 2019 at 04:21:46 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Roger Shimizu (2019-06-30):
>> Thank for the above doc, which is quite easy understanding and
>> straightforward!
>> […]
>> I confirmed with /boot set up in LUKS1, everything works fine.
>> It‘d configure non encrypted
Hi Roger,
Roger Shimizu (2019-06-30):
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:06 AM Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 23:24:19 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > >>> One could argue that cryptodisk support has never been supported by
> > >>> d-i anyway,
> > >>
> > >>
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:06 AM Guilhem Moulin wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 23:24:19 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >>> One could argue that cryptodisk support has never been supported by
> >>> d-i anyway,
> >>
> >> Yup, and I suppose that's why I overlooked this in my mail
Hi there,
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 23:24:19 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>>> One could argue that cryptodisk support has never been supported by
>>> d-i anyway,
>>
>> Yup, and I suppose that's why I overlooked this in my mail to
>> debian-boot :-P Jonathan Carter had a similar report last week
>>
Hi kibi,
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 23:24:19 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I'm also immensely grateful for all the security-related work Matthew
> Garrett puts everywhere he goes, but I'm not sure that MR qualifies as
> “requested by d-i [0]” as you mentioned in [2].
Just to state that publicly:
9 matches
Mail list logo
