Your message dated Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:58:14 +0000 with message-id <e1inez4-000hup...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#927481: fixed in sopel 6.6.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #927481, regarding .help fails with "Sorry! Something went wrong." to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 927481: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=927481 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: sopel Version: 6.6.2-1 Severity: grave Sopel, in stable and testing right now, cannot provide a "help" to its users. It makes it really hard to use (hence the "grave" severity). I'm also marking this as grave because upstream keeps on churning out "patch" releases (according to semver) that are really "minor" releases (according to semver again), so they are not suitable for stable updates. For example right now there is 6.6.4 release that fixes this bug: https://sopel.chat/changelog/6.6.4/ ... but it also includes changes like: * Cleaned up code in instagram and unicode modules * Core modules now use bot.channels instead of deprecated bot.privileges Which couldn't be eligible for a stable update. Because I do not want to maintain a fork of 6.6.3 the way I will probably have to do with 6.5.0 in stretch (argh), i think it's better to remove sopel from buster and maintain it from backports in the future (if at all). -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.8 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (1, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-8-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages sopel depends on: ii adduser 3.115 ii lsb-base 9.20161125 ii python3 3.5.3-1 ii python3-geoip2 2.4.2+dfsg1-1 ii python3-praw 3.3.0-1 ii python3-requests 2.12.4-1 ii python3-tz 2016.7-0.3 ii python3-xmltodict 0.10.2-1 Versions of packages sopel recommends: ii ipython3 5.1.0-3 ii python3-enchant 1.6.7-1 ii python3-feedparser 5.1.3-3 ii python3-lxml 3.7.1-1 sopel suggests no packages. -- Configuration Files: /etc/sopel.cfg changed [not included] -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Source: sopel Source-Version: 6.6.9-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of sopel, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 927...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Antoine Beaupré <anar...@debian.org> (supplier of updated sopel package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 09:52:59 -0400 Source: sopel Architecture: source Version: 6.6.9-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packa...@qa.debian.org> Changed-By: Antoine Beaupré <anar...@debian.org> Closes: 927481 Changes: sopel (6.6.9-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * orphan package: . I do not use Sopel anymore and therefore can't serve as a good maintainer. I also couldn't find a good reason to use this instead of more established codebase like Limnoria, which are seeing way more development and third-party packages. . Limnoria is also well-maintained in Debian, so I am not sure sopel is worth inclusion in Debian in the first place anymore. * new upstream release (Closes: #927481) Checksums-Sha1: 7034688b75f507e02a60d31a7ce7b10ca56b9247 1508 sopel_6.6.9-1.dsc e0e67304bb3a02d4c1da753ff16a89a016bab19e 175820 sopel_6.6.9.orig.tar.gz 3ef5e7374808ba33af4e965ef9574e7ef752fbbd 7712 sopel_6.6.9-1.debian.tar.xz cc8fcd829f4e6087e34dd0a4f4fff9353da1b300 5979 sopel_6.6.9-1_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: ea6b1073b758e1541d3ed8f86eebebd8f9e0af3e17057763d31d1c3dd12c643e 1508 sopel_6.6.9-1.dsc c9d1c7a1c1b25b6236dd47dc5f3160344ca89b0832715c4ab7a55c25ada3c807 175820 sopel_6.6.9.orig.tar.gz b0c156c2fa66480d0343965c123647686107889907b217ce64687393ab3c378d 7712 sopel_6.6.9-1.debian.tar.xz f07de18383add1f5a41a60dd89f24f3eebfefb2c51cb5b365b00c0e1434fab8a 5979 sopel_6.6.9-1_amd64.buildinfo Files: 93093236966df85817185aa4b50ecf1f 1508 net optional sopel_6.6.9-1.dsc 13a34029585e417d4f36fa6fbe0ac3ce 175820 net optional sopel_6.6.9.orig.tar.gz c74cc59c8e60e361d784db7097f8b183 7712 net optional sopel_6.6.9-1.debian.tar.xz 07d3c271ed8f0a1f3c182ffdb1dc54dc 5979 net optional sopel_6.6.9-1_amd64.buildinfo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEexZCBNCWcjsBljWrPqHd3bJh2XsFAl2xsG4ACgkQPqHd3bJh 2Xtv2Af/SYVSkGoq9KGEfTHCsz3Fb+BkxEJggLuwbUyt0qYZBJ7UE/WMJTUK+Dk0 6Z+YLP2lv/ZzlTDDbbGPqK71EoDuFSqEK84UaGRWps2cXfhBHwkOcs8V/dCxjHlm iXIiubS2FI47WQnhgG0jrRC2VVEovU/oOXvQFg4SWSYzZbAqSIydmyTn6lPd0zfX rVLp11xtcX1cXzCUB5FpCP8Dg9n90QdmtKIHhpKaIijkfbv2EiDpFHVzaUq45HzE nDYQ48vpwGIjA1XkEfs4fuOM9W/e/uUDz39gIsjluZuc2B++V1QN3btCO1Q1CMnl AQnCGP5PyBXaxQFSG42ktf4wir7TPw== =cf4H -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
