> > $ apt-cache rdepends python-gmpy
> > python-gmpy
> > Reverse Depends:
> >obfsproxy
> >python-tlslite-ng
> >python-sympy
> >python-gmpy-doc
> >
> >
>
> Dependencies on obfsproxy and python-sympy documented with affects and
> blocks. python-tlslite-ng has been removed already,
th
On 2/2/20 8:39 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
$ apt-cache rdepends python-gmpy
python-gmpy
Reverse Depends:
obfsproxy
python-tlslite-ng
python-sympy
python-gmpy-doc
Dependencies on obfsproxy and python-sympy documented with affects and
blocks. python-tlslite-ng has been removed alread
On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 10:55:23 -0800 Martin Kelly
wrote:
On 2/2/20 8:39 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> should we remove this package then? or do you want to generate a python3-gmpy?
>
I didn't realize, but it looks like this package actually does support
Python 3. I had assumed we would let this packa
> Is it possible to remove the AUTORM tag until this is done, or should we
> let it get deleted and upload a new python3-gmpy package after that?
it will just be removed from testing, which is fine: it will go back
in when the python3 package hits unstable and no more RC bugs pop up
--
Sandro "m
On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 11:13:20AM -0800, Martin Kelly wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 10:55:23 -0800 Martin Kelly
> wrote:
> > On 2/2/20 8:39 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > > should we remove this package then? or do you want to generate a
> > > python3-gmpy?
> > >
> >
> > I didn't realize, but it look
On 4/13/20 2:25 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 11:13:20AM -0800, Martin Kelly wrote:
On Sat, 8 Feb 2020 10:55:23 -0800 Martin Kelly
wrote:
On 2/2/20 8:39 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
should we remove this package then? or do you want to generate a python3-gmpy?
I didn't rea
6 matches
Mail list logo