Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #940127 [src:ghostscript, src:c2esp] gs segfaults in c2esp filter chain
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
940127: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=940127
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Control: severity -1 important
Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2019-11-14 14:28:35)
> @Didier: Since you reassigned this to (only) ghostscript, would you
> please consider re-reassigning to (only) c2esp instead?
>
> Reason I ask is that ghostscript is now security-buggy in testing
> since a month, se
Quoting Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2019-09-22 15:30:53)
> Le dimanche, 22 septembre 2019, 13.25:19 h CEST Brian Potkin a écrit :
> > On Sat 21 Sep 2019 at 17:39:20 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > > Le samedi, 21 septembre 2019, 16.24:30 h CEST Brian Potkin a écrit :
> > > > > There's clearly a re
On 22/09/2019 13:25, Brian Potkin wrote:
Would this do?
cat /usr/share/cups/data/form_russian.pdf | gs -dQUIET -dPARANOIDSAFER -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH
-dNOINTERPOLATE -dNOMEDIAATTRS -dShowAcroForm -sstdout=%stderr -sOutputFile=%stdout
-sDEVICE=cups -r600x600 -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=595 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOI
Le dimanche, 22 septembre 2019, 13.25:19 h CEST Brian Potkin a écrit :
> On Sat 21 Sep 2019 at 17:39:20 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > Le samedi, 21 septembre 2019, 16.24:30 h CEST Brian Potkin a écrit :
> > > > There's clearly a regression in ghostscript 9.28 that started
> > > > segfaulti
On Sat 21 Sep 2019 at 17:39:20 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le samedi, 21 septembre 2019, 16.24:30 h CEST Brian Potkin a écrit :
> > > There's clearly a regression in ghostscript 9.28 that started segfaulting
> > > in the c2esp filter chain. But I can't manage to reproduce it outside of
>
On Sat 21 Sep 2019 at 17:39:20 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le samedi, 21 septembre 2019, 16.24:30 h CEST Brian Potkin a écrit :
> > > There's clearly a regression in ghostscript 9.28 that started segfaulting
> > > in the c2esp filter chain. But I can't manage to reproduce it outside of
>
All,
I was the author of c2esp. It's hard for me to test it now because I no
longer have kodak printers.
I'm wondering if other backends also use the gstoraster filter (I'd
expect there would be others?) and do they also cause this error? Or did
I do something unusual in c2espC that's contri
Le samedi, 21 septembre 2019, 16.24:30 h CEST Brian Potkin a écrit :
> > There's clearly a regression in ghostscript 9.28 that started segfaulting
> > in the c2esp filter chain. But I can't manage to reproduce it outside of
> > the "cups + c2esp + cups-filters (gstoraster) + ghostscript" environmen
On Sat 21 Sep 2019 at 10:22:22 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
[...]
> Using snapshot.debian.org:
>
> * ghostscript 9.27~dfsg-3.1 works
> * ghostscript 9.28~~rc1~dfsg-1 and all the later versions segfault
>
> So…
>
> There's clearly a regression in ghostscript 9.28 that started segfaulting
Control: notfound -1 c2esp/27-4
Control: affects -1 c2esp
Control: found -1 ghostscript/9.28~~rc1~dfsg-1
Control: retitle -1 gs segfaults in c2esp filter chain
Hi Paul,
thanks for the detailed report.
Le jeudi, 12 septembre 2019, 19.27:46 h CEST Paul Gevers a écrit :
> Dear maintainers,
>
> Wit
Processing control commands:
> notfound -1 c2esp/27-4
Bug #940127 [src:ghostscript, src:c2esp] ghostscript makes c2esp autopkgtest
timeout
No longer marked as found in versions c2esp/27-4.
> affects -1 c2esp
Bug #940127 [src:ghostscript, src:c2esp] ghostscript makes c2esp autopkgtest
timeout
Add
Source: ghostscript, c2esp
Control: found -1 ghostscript/9.28~~rc2~dfsg-1
Control: found -1 c2esp/27-4
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update timeout
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of gho
13 matches
Mail list logo
