Hi all,
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 06:59:17PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> [...]
>
> Florian Bruhin wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, is there a way I could've found out myself?
> > https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=pyqt5webengine doesn't
> > seem to say much about this situation.
>
> Probably
Hi Florian and Dmitry,
Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> > I don't really understand why - can someone elaborate on what's going on?
>
> That is because the Python 3 version of calibre failed to build on two
> architectures (arm64, mipsel), so calibre in testing still uses Python 2,
> so some packages
Hey Dmitry,
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 01:04:35PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Hi Florian!
>
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 10:36:22AM +0100, Florian Bruhin wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > It looks like 5.14.0-2 with the fix isn't in testing yet? See
> > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pyqt5webengine
> >
Hi Florian!
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 10:36:22AM +0100, Florian Bruhin wrote:
> Hey,
>
> It looks like 5.14.0-2 with the fix isn't in testing yet? See
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pyqt5webengine
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=pyqt5webengine
>
> I don't really understand why - can
Hey,
It looks like 5.14.0-2 with the fix isn't in testing yet? See
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pyqt5webengine
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=pyqt5webengine
I don't really understand why - can someone elaborate on what's going on?
It looks like dependent packages (like qutebrowser,
5 matches
Mail list logo