Your message dated Wed, 01 Apr 2020 19:08:19 +0000
with message-id <e1jjiip-0004id...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#955372: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #952035,
regarding ruby-ridley: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed:      ArgumentError:
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
952035: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=952035
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ruby-ridley
Version: 5.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: buster sid
Usertags: ftbfs-20200222 ftbfs-buster

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.

Relevant part (hopefully):
>      ArgumentError:
>        extra arguments
>      # ./lib/ridley/connection.rb:148:in `block in stream'
>      # ./lib/ridley/connection.rb:147:in `stream'
>      # (celluloid):0:in `remote procedure call'
>      # (celluloid):0:in `remote procedure call'
>      # ./lib/ridley/chef_objects/cookbook_object.rb:140:in `download_file'
>      # ./lib/ridley/chef_objects/cookbook_object.rb:90:in `block (2 levels) 
> in download'
>      # ./lib/ridley/chef_objects/cookbook_object.rb:87:in `each'
>      # ./lib/ridley/chef_objects/cookbook_object.rb:87:in `block in download'
>      # ./lib/ridley/chef_objects/cookbook_object.rb:84:in `each'
>      # ./lib/ridley/chef_objects/cookbook_object.rb:84:in `download'
>      # ./lib/ridley/resources/cookbook_resource.rb:84:in `download'
>      # (celluloid):0:in `remote procedure call'
>      # ./spec/acceptance/cookbook_resource_spec.rb:18:in `block (4 levels) in 
> <top (required)>'
> 
> Deprecation Warnings:
> 
> RSpec::Core::Configuration#treat_symbols_as_metadata_keys_with_true_values= 
> is deprecated, it is now set to true as default and setting it to false has 
> no effect.
> 
> Using `stub` from rspec-mocks' old `:should` syntax without explicitly 
> enabling the syntax is deprecated. Use the new `:expect` syntax or explicitly 
> enable `:should` instead. Called from 
> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/celluloid/calls.rb:26:in `public_send'.
> 
> 
> If you need more of the backtrace for any of these deprecations to
> identify where to make the necessary changes, you can configure
> `config.raise_errors_for_deprecations!`, and it will turn the
> deprecation warnings into errors, giving you the full backtrace.
> 
> 2 deprecation warnings total
> 
> Finished in 4.85 seconds (files took 1.96 seconds to load)
> 461 examples, 1 failure, 18 pending
> 
> Failed examples:
> 
> rspec ./spec/acceptance/cookbook_resource_spec.rb:20 # Client API operations 
> downloading a cookbook when the cookbook of the name/version is found 
> downloads the cookbook to the destination
> 
> /usr/bin/ruby2.7 
> -I/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-support-3.9.2/lib:/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.9.1/lib
>  /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-core-3.9.1/exe/rspec 
> --pattern ./spec/\*\*/\*_spec.rb failed
> ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: 

The full build log is available from:
   http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/02/22/ruby-ridley_5.1.1-1_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 5.1.1-1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package ruby-ridley has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/955372

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to