Hi all,
On 21-11-2022 21:36, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 21-11-2022 16:01, Andrius Merkys wrote:
On 2022-11-20 18:18, Paul Gevers wrote:
From the BSP in Tilburg, I uploaded the attached NMU to DELAYED/5.
Please let me know if I should delay more or cancel.
Thanks, IMO this NMU is fine. Similar
Hi,
On 21-11-2022 16:01, Andrius Merkys wrote:
On 2022-11-20 18:18, Paul Gevers wrote:
From the BSP in Tilburg, I uploaded the attached NMU to DELAYED/5.
Please let me know if I should delay more or cancel.
Thanks, IMO this NMU is fine. Similar logic should be applied to the
build time
Hi,
On 2022-11-20 18:18, Paul Gevers wrote:
From the BSP in Tilburg, I uploaded the attached NMU to DELAYED/5.
Please let me know if I should delay more or cancel.
Thanks, IMO this NMU is fine. Similar logic should be applied to the
build time tests in future, since now their failures are
Hello,
IMO it is high time to revisit this issue.
On 2020-03-11 14:33, Matthias Klose wrote:
> openbabel autopkg tests areq quiet interesting. Working around the timeout on
> arm64 hides the fact that two other tests fail on every non-amd64
> architecture.
I agree that the way the autopkgtest
4 matches
Mail list logo
