Bug#957293: gnupg1: ftbfs with GCC-10

Control: tags 957293 pending upstream Matthias Klose wrote... > The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with > gcc-10/g++-10, but succeeds to build with gcc-9/g++-9. The > severity of this report will be raised before the bullseye release, > so nothing has to be done for th

Processed: Re: Bug#957293: gnupg1: ftbfs with GCC-10

Processing control commands: > tags 957293 pending upstream Bug #957293 [src:gnupg1] gnupg1: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) upstream and pending. -- 957293: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=957293 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: gnupg1: diff for NMU version 1.4.23-1.1 (was: Bug#957293: gnupg1: ftbfs with GCC-10)

Processing control commands: > forwarded 957293 https://dev.gnupg.org/T5215 Bug #957293 [src:gnupg1] gnupg1: ftbfs with GCC-10 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://dev.gnupg.org/T5215'. > tags 957293 + patch Bug #957293 [src:gnupg1] gnupg1: ftbfs with GCC-10 Added tag(s) patch. -- 957293: ht

Bug#957293: gnupg1: diff for NMU version 1.4.23-1.1 (was: Bug#957293: gnupg1: ftbfs with GCC-10)

Control: forwarded 957293 https://dev.gnupg.org/T5215 Control: tags 957293 + patch Dear maintainer, to resolve this issue, I've prepared an NMU for gnupg1 (versioned as 1.4.23-1.1), upload to DELAYED/2 will follow in a moment. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards,