Chris Lamb wrote:
> I'd like to perform another Lintian release but for various reasons
> I'd prefer to have this issue addressed before doing another upload.
Just to be 100% explicit here, I don't feel I can cut a new release
until this bug is resolved.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' :
Control: tags -1 patch
*Sigh*
On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 08:38:05 -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 11:15 PM Chris Lamb wrote:
> >
> > Felix, can you help out? I am not in a position to contribute to this
> > discussion itself.
>
> Well, I wish I could. Guillem makes many
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #962158 [lintian] lintian: Swapped exit statuses and --fail-on default
value require downstream adjustments
Added tag(s) patch.
--
962158: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962158
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Felix Lechner wrote:
> It would also give me more time to understand the possibly
> unreasonable burden on Lintian users across Debian and the derivative
> ecosystem. Simon may receive feedback from Ubuntu, a significant
> derivative. If there are real problems, I am happy to discuss a
> solution
Hi Chris,
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 11:15 PM Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> Felix, can you help out? I am not in a position to contribute to this
> discussion itself.
Well, I wish I could. Guillem makes many alarmist statements, but
fails to explain why the change is an undue burden. I also do not know
how
Guillem Jover wrote:
> [..]
I'd like to perform another Lintian release but for various reasons
I'd prefer to have this issue addressed before doing another upload. I
already regret that this migrated to bullseye before we elevated the
severity.
Felix, can you help out? I am not in a position
On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 15:58:47 -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> > This change means that any current caller which uses lintian as part
> > of its acceptance testing will now silently let broken things through
>
> As I explained on IRC this statement is probably untrue (and you did
> not have the
Hi!
On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 23:06:29 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> severity 962158 serious
> thanks
> > Severity: important
> >
> > This probably deserves to be serious, but I'm not sure I can be
> > bothered…
>
> I can relate to this feeling so let me do this for you. At the very
> least, this
severity 962158 serious
thanks
Guillem,
> Severity: important
>
> This probably deserves to be serious, but I'm not sure I can be
> bothered…
I can relate to this feeling so let me do this for you. At the very
least, this change now won't hit bullseye before being resolved.
Regards,
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 962158 serious
Bug #962158 [lintian] lintian: Swapped exit statuses and --fail-on default
value require downstream adjustments
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
10 matches
Mail list logo
