Bug#962275: snort: Failed to start LSB

2020-07-19 Thread Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
An update on this bug: The missing symbols issue is really a problem in the daq library. A patch introduced in 2.0.7-1 to fix some FTBFS bugs (959617, 958101) actually disabled symbols in the library which are required. This will be soon fixed. The issue related to the library location is a

Bug#962275: snort: Failed to start LSB

2020-07-06 Thread Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
Dear Thorsten, Indeed I have found two issues in the Snort package related to this bug report: 1.- The location of the libraries in /etc/snort.conf is not correct for different architectures. I need to find a way to ammend this value when the package gets compiled (or find a way to locate this

Bug#962275: snort: Failed to start LSB

2020-06-10 Thread Thorsten Bonow
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino writes: Could you please confirm if the 'eth0' interface is available in the system? One possible reason for startup failing is that the interface is not the correct one (administrator should configure the proper one via debconf). Dear Javier, the 'eth0' interface

Bug#962275: snort: Failed to start LSB

2020-06-10 Thread Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 15:09, Thorsten Bonow wrote: > Package: snort > Version: 2.9.15.1-2 > Severity: grave > > Dear Maintainer, > > installation of 'snort' fails with a subprocess error (fresh install, > /etc/snort doesn't exist before installation. Accepting the propose > d network settings:

Bug#962275: snort: Failed to start LSB

2020-06-05 Thread Thorsten Bonow
Package: snort Version: 2.9.15.1-2 Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, installation of 'snort' fails with a subprocess error (fresh install, /etc/snort doesn't exist before installation. Accepting the propose d network settings: 192.168.0.0/16). Aptitude output: