Your message dated Thu, 09 Jul 2020 14:36:42 +0000
with message-id <e1jtxfg-000grv...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#962755: fixed in exif 0.6.22-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #962755,
regarding exif: FTBFS on s390x: test failure
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
962755: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=962755
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: exif
Vresion: 0.6.22-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: hugh.mcmas...@outlook.com

Dear Debian exif package maintainers,

The new upload of exif/0.6.22-1 FTBFS on s390x architecture due to test
failure:

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=exif&arch=s390x&ver=0.6.22-1&stamp=1591715266&raw=0

PASS: check-create-tags.sh
PASS: check-help.sh
PASS: check-init-mandatory-tags.sh
FAIL: check-add-tags.sh
PASS: check-param-validity.sh
PASS: check-required-file.sh
PASS: check-show-description.sh
PASS: check-show-tag.sh
PASS: check-tag-description.sh
PASS: check-thumbnail.sh
PASS: check-version.sh
PASS: check-no-seek.sh
================================================================
   libexif command line interface 0.6.22: test/test-suite.log
================================================================

# TOTAL: 12
# PASS:  11
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0

Can you examine it and eventually fix it, perhaps using a porterbox?

-- 
Regards,
Boyuan Yang

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: exif
Source-Version: 0.6.22-2
Done: Hugh McMaster <hugh.mcmas...@outlook.com>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
exif, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 962...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Hugh McMaster <hugh.mcmas...@outlook.com> (supplier of updated exif package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 20:58:17 +1000
Source: exif
Architecture: source
Version: 0.6.22-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian PhotoTools Maintainers 
<pkg-phototools-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Hugh McMaster <hugh.mcmas...@outlook.com>
Closes: 962755
Changes:
 exif (0.6.22-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Add upstream patch to fix test failures on big endian systems
     (Closes: #962755).
Checksums-Sha1:
 318cf5564f4a3af98431269beb17777afd820efa 1969 exif_0.6.22-2.dsc
 af221fc90c61540c5d16597fca22c75b75ffd735 6848 exif_0.6.22-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 f274b271b81ead7ece4672e56e41782922cb72d60382c395ee306a7cdf65a859 1969 
exif_0.6.22-2.dsc
 d505f235a672cce442df47f199e6bc48240d8386fdd9e35ada6c84a6e6b35f65 6848 
exif_0.6.22-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 deba1d3010060b121b09389e2e585882 1969 graphics optional exif_0.6.22-2.dsc
 4eb8d42a29402df4b287f28db20ff4ab 6848 graphics optional 
exif_0.6.22-2.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=2P1h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to