Bug#965001: strange version 2.1.0 beta4 fails tests with mpfr4 4.1.0

2020-07-30 Thread Case Van Horsen
Hello, I modified the test suite to accept either result. Tests pass with either GMP6.2.0/MPFR4.1.0/MPC1.2.0rc1 or GMP6.1.2/MPFR4.0.2/MPC1.1.0. The source code has been released via PyPi at https://pypi.org/project/gmpy2/2.1.0b5/#files The same code has also been released via GitHub at

Bug#965001: strange version 2.1.0 beta4 fails tests with mpfr4 4.1.0

2020-07-30 Thread Martin Kelly
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020, 6:48 AM Case Van Horsen wrote: > I will update the test suite today. (The offending test will be > removed from test_gmpy2_format.txt and moved to test_mpfr40_format.txt > and test_mpfr41_format.txt with the appropriate version chosen.) > > Will this release move to MPC

Bug#965001: strange version 2.1.0 beta4 fails tests with mpfr4 4.1.0

2020-07-30 Thread Case Van Horsen
I will update the test suite today. (The offending test will be removed from test_gmpy2_format.txt and moved to test_mpfr40_format.txt and test_mpfr41_format.txt with the appropriate version chosen.) Will this release move to MPC 1.2.0? Case On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 6:36 AM Martin Kelly wrote:

Bug#965001: strange version 2.1.0 beta4 fails tests with mpfr4 4.1.0

2020-07-30 Thread Martin Kelly
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020, 5:34 AM Matthias Klose wrote: > On 7/30/20 3:42 AM, Martin Kelly wrote: > > Apparently this bug is going to cause autoremoval from testing soon. Is > the > > severity really high enough for that? > > yes, because it blocks migration of mpfr4, used by our GCC packages. I'm

Bug#965001: strange version 2.1.0 beta4 fails tests with mpfr4 4.1.0

2020-07-30 Thread Matthias Klose
On 7/30/20 3:42 AM, Martin Kelly wrote: > Apparently this bug is going to cause autoremoval from testing soon. Is the > severity really high enough for that? yes, because it blocks migration of mpfr4, used by our GCC packages. I'm certainly biased, however I'd like to see the new mpfr4 in use

Bug#965001: strange version 2.1.0 beta4 fails tests with mpfr4 4.1.0

2020-07-29 Thread Martin Kelly
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020, 4:27 PM Martin Kelly wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020, 3:15 AM Vincent Lefevre wrote: > >> On 2020-07-14 09:48:18 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >> > There is no 2.1.0 beta4, just a beta1, so I don't know what was >> packaged in >> > February 2020. However the tests now fail

Bug#965001: strange version 2.1.0 beta4 fails tests with mpfr4 4.1.0

2020-07-15 Thread Martin Kelly
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020, 3:15 AM Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2020-07-14 09:48:18 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > There is no 2.1.0 beta4, just a beta1, so I don't know what was packaged > in > > February 2020. However the tests now fail with mpfr 4.1.0, seems to be > > consistent across all