On 30/08/2020 13:37, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> On 30/08/2020 13:22, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
Would you be able to test 4.19.142?
>>>
>>> If you can give me a route to getting .deb files for that version then
>>> sure - a download or a pointer to instructions.
>>
>>
On 30/08/2020 13:22, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>>> Would you be able to test 4.19.142?
>>
>> If you can give me a route to getting .deb files for that version then
>> sure - a download or a pointer to instructions.
>
> *unofficial* and *temporary* builds for that version can be
Hi Richard,
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 12:16:55PM +0100, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> On 29/08/2020 15:36, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 12:58:47PM +0100, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> >> I've had further crashes under 4.19.0-10-amd64 on a second machine.
On 29/08/2020 15:36, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 12:58:47PM +0100, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
>> I've had further crashes under 4.19.0-10-amd64 on a second machine.
>> Again, after reverting to 4.19.0-9-amd64 this second machine seems to be
>> stable.
>>
Hi Richard,
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 12:58:47PM +0100, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> I've had further crashes under 4.19.0-10-amd64 on a second machine.
> Again, after reverting to 4.19.0-9-amd64 this second machine seems to be
> stable.
>
> The full logs are at
5 matches
Mail list logo
