On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 05:55:13PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
>...
> I was not aware it was considered RC to be an empty package. Isn't the
> severity exaggerated?
>...
"makes the package in question unusable by most or all users"
I would argue this applies to a doc package that does not actua
Le 25/04/2021 à 12:29, Romain Porte a écrit :
> In commit b9b0e260 the documentation is removed in d/rules on purpose,
> but the binary package libjs-of-ocaml-docs is not removed from
> d/control. This leads to the creation of an empty package.
Building libjs-of-ocaml-doc requires ocaml-odoc, whic
Control: patch
In commit b9b0e260 the documentation is removed in d/rules on purpose,
but the binary package libjs-of-ocaml-docs is not removed from
d/control. This leads to the creation of an empty package.
Please apply attached patch to fix the issue.
Best regards,
Romain, on behalf of the De
Package: libjs-of-ocaml-doc
Version: 3.8.0-1
Severity: grave
$ dpkg -L libjs-of-ocaml-doc
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/libjs-of-ocaml-doc
/usr/share/doc/libjs-of-ocaml-doc/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/share/doc/libjs-of-ocaml-doc/changelog.gz
/usr/share/doc/libjs-of-ocaml-doc/copyr
4 matches
Mail list logo
