Control: severity -1 important intrigeri (2021-06-02): > I see you've made this bug RC. I'd like to better understand the > severity, so I can figure out what I should do for Bullseye. > I'm wondering because I'm using this AppArmor policy on sid with > apt-cacher-ng myself, and I can't find traces of such denials in > my logs. > > Could you please help me understand what kind of apt-cacher-ng > operations (or configuration) trigger these denials and are broken by > the current AppArmor policy?
I'm downgrading severity until this is clarified: with the information _currently_ available to me, this bug does not make the package unfit for Bullseye, so triggering auto-removal seems a bit extreme. Happy to change my mind once I have more info :)