Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #989193 [apparmor-profiles-extra] breaks apt-cacher-ng by blocking link
operation
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
989193: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989193
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #989193 [apparmor-profiles-extra] breaks apt-cacher-ng by blocking link
operation
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
989193: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989193
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: severity -1 important
intrigeri (2021-06-02):
> I see you've made this bug RC. I'd like to better understand the
> severity, so I can figure out what I should do for Bullseye.
> I'm wondering because I'm using this AppArmor policy on sid with
> apt-cacher-ng myself, and I can't find
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + upstream
Bug #989193 [apparmor-profiles-extra] breaks apt-cacher-ng by blocking link
operation
Added tag(s) upstream.
> forwarded -1 https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor-profiles/-/merge_requests/51
Bug #989193 [apparmor-profiles-extra] breaks
Control: tag -1 + upstream
Control: forwarded -1
https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor-profiles/-/merge_requests/51
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
Eduard Bloch (2021-05-28):
> see attachment, your config which doesn't allow link calls, which
> sporadically breaks operation of apt-cacher-ng in
Package: apparmor-profiles-extra
Version: 1.33
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
see attachment, your config which doesn't allow link calls, which
sporadically breaks operation of apt-cacher-ng in unexpected ways.
The suggested change should probably be improved, I am no apparmor
expert.
[
6 matches
Mail list logo
