* Marcos Fouces:
> I pushed a "debian/stretch" branch [1] to the repo without all
> changes i've made so far bug the patch that fixes this bug.
Despite my opinion about dsniff in general, I'd sponsor an upload if you
include all fixes (i.e. current debian/master branch, d1ef9519). You
should ask
* Marcos Fouces:
> I pushed a "debian/stretch" branch [1] to the repo without all
> changes i've made so far bug the patch that fixes this bug.
>
> It is still posible to get sniff in shape for stretch? If so, could
> you sponsor it or tell me what else to do?
I had a look into your commits afte
Anyone?
El 09/03/17 a las 15:33, Marcos Fouces escribió:
Hello Hilko
I pushed a "debian/stretch" branch [1] to the repo without all
changes i've made so far bug the patch that fixes this bug.
It is still posible to get sniff in shape for stretch? If so, could
you sponsor it or tell me wha
Hello Hilko
I pushed a "debian/stretch" branch [1] to the repo without all changes
i've made so far bug the patch that fixes this bug.
It is still posible to get sniff in shape for stretch? If so, could you
sponsor it or tell me what else to do?
Thanks,
Marcos
[1]
https://anonscm.debian
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 grave
Bug #855869 [dsniff] dsniff: segfaults on portmapper messages
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
--
855869: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855869
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
5 matches
Mail list logo
