Bug#954761: lintian: crashes with: coercion for "original_severity" failed: Unknown tag severity serious

On Sun, 2020-03-22 at 20:45 -0700, Felix Lechner wrote: > Well, that's what I did with xdeb, but it is causing #954415. BTW, re the lintian binary-is-wrong-architecture tag description, Emdebian no longer exists so it would be best to not mention it. > My inclination is yes, although personal pr

Bug#954622: marked as done (jitterdebugger: FTBFS: jitterdebugger.c:139:14: error: static declaration of ‘gettid’ follows non-static declaration)

Your message dated Mon, 23 Mar 2020 03:50:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#954622: fixed in jitterdebugger 0.3.1+git20200117.b90ff3a-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #954622, regarding jitterdebugger: FTBFS: jitterdebugger.c:139:14: error: static declaration of ‘gettid’ follows non

Processed: 954619 is forwarded

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 954619 https://gitlab.com/ase/ase/-/issues/602 Bug #954619 [src:python-ase] python-ase: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p "3.7 3.8" returned exit code 13 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://gitlab.com

Bug#954392: marked as done (libc6-dev-armhf-cross is incompatible with current libc6-dev:armhf)

Your message dated Mon, 23 Mar 2020 07:40:07 +0100 with message-id <21a4a026-be00-1136-43ab-24d27f708...@debian.org> and subject line Re: libc6-dev-armhf-cross is incompatible with current libc6-dev:armhf has caused the Debian Bug report #954392, regarding libc6-dev-armhf-cross is incompatible wit

Bug#954518: marked as done (cross-toolchain-base-ports: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat 'debian/libgcc-9-dev-alpha-cross/usr/lib/gcc-cross/alpha-linux-gnu/9/include/ISO_Fortran_binding.h': No such file or dire

Your message dated Mon, 23 Mar 2020 06:49:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#954518: fixed in cross-toolchain-base-ports 37 has caused the Debian Bug report #954518, regarding cross-toolchain-base-ports: FTBFS: mv: cannot stat 'debian/libgcc-9-dev-alpha-cross/usr/lib/gcc-cross/alpha-li

Bug#950484: marked as done (apertium-is-sv FTBFS with apertium 3.6.1)

Your message dated Mon, 23 Mar 2020 06:49:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#950484: fixed in apertium-is-sv 0.1.0~r76450-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #950484, regarding apertium-is-sv FTBFS with apertium 3.6.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

<    1   2   3   4   5