Your message dated Mon, 05 Oct 2009 05:34:20 +
with message-id e1mugde-0002ud...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#478463: fixed in sixpack 1:0.66-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #478463,
regarding sixpack: should use python-numpy instead of python-num{eric,array}
to be marked as done.
Let's try some simple and stupid debugging. Somebody who can reliably
reproduce the problem please add something like this to the *end* of
/lib/udev/rules.d/85-hwclock.rules :
KERNEL==rtc0, RUN+=/bin/touch /dev/rtc0-appeared
KERNEL==rtc0, RUN+=logger.agent
Hello,
I did try it and it was
Package: corosync,openais-legacy
Version: corosync/1.0.0-6
Version: openais-legacy/0.80.5+svn20090522-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2009-10-05
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file
Package: libcorosync-dev,libopenais-legacy-dev
Version: libcorosync-dev/1.0.0-6
Version: libopenais-legacy-dev/0.80.5+svn20090522-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2009-10-05
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of
Package: libqsearch-gomp-dev,libqsearch1-headers
Version: libqsearch-gomp-dev/1.0.8-2
Version: libqsearch1-headers/1.0.8-2
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2009-10-05
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages
Package: simh,afflib-tools
Version: simh/3.8.1-1
Version: afflib-tools/3.3.6+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2009-10-05
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time
package mandos-client
retitle 549585 udev: creates /dev/{u,}random with too strict permissions
summary 549585 20
tags 549585 patch
reassign 549585 udev 146-3
package udev
affects 549585 mandos-client
thanks
Teddy Hogeborn te...@fukt.bsnet.se writes:
Indeed, it seems that both /dev/random and
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package mandos-client
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'mandos-client'
Limit currently set to 'package':'mandos-client'
retitle 549585 udev: creates /dev/{u,}random with too strict permissions
Bug #549585
Package: soci
Version: 3.0.0+cvs20081223-3
Justification: FTBFS
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@superh.org
Usertags: sh4
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-sup...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I am now trying to run Debian on Renesas SH CPU(sh4).
soci FTBFS on sh4. I checked on i386 by pbuilder, I get
Your message dated Mon, 05 Oct 2009 07:17:26 +
with message-id e1muhp0-0003e3...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#542158: fixed in gnat-4.4 4.4.1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #542158,
regarding gnat-4.4: Unchecked_Deallocation causes double-free errors
(amd64-specific)
to be marked
reassign 538313 openssh 1:5.1p1-6
reassign 549620 openssh 1:5.1p1-7
forcemerge 538313 549620
thanks
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 05:10:23AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Using slogin to connect to another machine on the local network results
in slogin segfaulting. The ssh
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 538313 openssh 1:5.1p1-6
Bug #538313 [openssh-client] ssh segmentation fault (mipsel)
Bug reassigned from package 'openssh-client' to 'openssh'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions openssh/1:5.1p1-6.
Bug #538313 [openssh] ssh
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 537972 grave
Bug #537972 [openssh-client] ssh-keygen segfaults on my indy r5k
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
retitle 537972 mips* built as PIE and is broken
Bug #537972 [openssh-client] ssh-keygen segfaults on my indy r5k
Changed
[Marco d'Itri]
Petter determined that this works. I think that the real problem is
that the RUN rules in 85-hwclock.rules are only executed if
ENV{BADYEAR} exists.
Could be.
Importing /etc/default/rcS as if were a list of variables looks like
a bad idea to me anyway, so please replace the
package gracie
tags 519623 + pending
thanks
On 01-Oct-2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Now that the blocking bug in debhelper has been fixed, what's still
needed to fix this bug?
I am working on the packaging of a new upstream version. This bug will
be fixed when that is uploaded.
--
\ “God
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package gracie
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'gracie'
Limit currently set to 'package':'gracie'
tags 519623 + pending
Bug #519623 [gracie] gracie cannot start
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing
On Thursday 24 September 2009 22:38:56 Andreas Barth wrote:
Package: cups
Version: 1.4.0-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
since this version cups started to FTBFS on mips*, see e.g.
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=cupsver=1.4.1-1arch=mipsstamp=1
253150726file=log
echo Linking
reopen 549112
thanks
supervise stores its run-state information in
/etc/service/${service}/supervise and
/etc/service/${service}/log/supervise. According to the FHS, this
information should go into /var, e.g. in /var/lib/supervise/${service}.
Hi, the supervise program stores the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 549112
Bug #549112 {Done: Gerrit Pape p...@smarden.org} [daemontools] daemontools:
supervise stores state in /etc
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: kmail
Version: 4:4.3.1-2
Severity: grave
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
After disk partion became 100% full, kmail crash because of no more
space avaible.
On restart some configuration files were corrupted. Filters have been
removed and also the configuration for
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 543375 + pending
Bug #543375 [util-linux] initscripts: last superblock write time in future
occurring sometimes
Added tag(s) pending.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 543375 + pending
Bug #543375 [util-linux] initscripts: last superblock write time in future
occurring sometimes
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #543375 to the same tags previously set
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 549661 important
Bug #549661 [xorg] xorg: Black screen on login
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
reassign 549661 xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.3.2-2+lenny6
Bug #549661 [xorg] xorg: Black screen on login
Bug reassigned from
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:35:22AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
Package: simh,afflib-tools
Version: simh/3.8.1-1
Version: afflib-tools/3.3.6+dfsg-3
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
This is a serious bug as it makes installation fail. Possible
solutions are to have the two packages conflict, to
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 06:12:57AM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
Gerritt, thanks for your answer. Forgive me, but really, this is a mess.
There are a several problems.
First, the documentation of update-service never explains that the contents
of /etc/service must all be symlinks. This
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
You are right that we should do an update for a point release of lenny
though to address a minor information disclosure vulnerability[1], plus
some other non-security related bugs. However, I'd like to avoid
upgrading to a newer 1.4.x release but backport changes
So what was the solution? Because I'm getting a similar error,
inability to find clx, when trying to start stumpwm (git version,
using sbcl and asdf to load).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 537972 openssh 1:5.1p1-6
Bug #537972 [openssh-client] mips* built as PIE and is broken
Bug reassigned from package 'openssh-client' to 'openssh'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions openssh/1:5.1p1-6.
Bug #537972 [openssh] mips*
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:04:23AM +0200, Mader, Alexander (N-MSR) wrote:
Something additional: I am running a Debian kernel not a self built one,
and /lib/udev/rules.d/85-hwclock.rules was not there in the first place
so I had to create it.
That file is delivered by util-linux what
Le lundi 05 octobre 2009 à 13:46 +0200, Vince Mulhollon a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:35:22AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
Package: simh,afflib-tools
Version: simh/3.8.1-1
Version: afflib-tools/3.3.6+dfsg-3
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
This is a serious bug as it makes
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 548792 1.9.13-1
Bug #548792 [gnumeric] gnumeric: WARNING **: NULL sheet in
gnm_sheet_get_size! and SEGV at startup
There is no source info for the package 'gnumeric' at version '1.9.13-1' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 548813 1.9.13-1
Bug #548813 [gnumeric] gnumeric fails to start with a symbol lookup error
There is no source info for the package 'gnumeric' at version '1.9.13-1' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '1.9.13-1'
* Christophe Monniez christophe.monn...@fccu.be [20091005 15:20]:
Le lundi 05 octobre 2009 à 13:46 +0200, Vince Mulhollon a écrit :
OK my interpretation of the situation, is you afflib guys really need
the name s3 because that is the full name of the amazon s3 service
you're trying
Your message dated Mon, 5 Oct 2009 14:33:29 +0100
with message-id 20091005133329.ga3...@deprecation.cyrius.com
and subject line Removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #547880,
regarding libddm-1-0: depends on obsolete Mission Control 4, libempathy23
to be marked as done.
This means that you
LaMont Jones schrieb:
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:04:23AM +0200, Mader, Alexander (N-MSR) wrote:
Something additional: I am running a Debian kernel not a self built one,
and /lib/udev/rules.d/85-hwclock.rules was not there in the first place
so I had to create it.
That file is delivered by
Your message dated Mon, 5 Oct 2009 14:32:50 +0100
with message-id 20091005133250.ga3...@deprecation.cyrius.com
and subject line emusic-remote removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #486414,
regarding emusic-remote: Not compatible with XULrunner 1.9
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:47:12 +
with message-id e1munuc-0001ms...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#549637: fixed in libqsearch 1.0.8-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #549637,
regarding libqsearch1-headers and libqsearch-gomp-dev: error when trying to
install together
to
Hi,
Could you provide more information? I can't do too much with the
information provided.
Regards,
--
Muammar El Khatib.
Linux user: 403107.
GPG Key = 127029F1
http://muammar.me | http://proyectociencia.org
,''`.
: :' :
`. `'
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
The patch included in 3.1.0-7 doesn't actually fix the problem. Normal
users can still set the ClientNameAlias by adding something like
override_ClientNameAlias=1v_zZ_ClientNameAlias= to their POST.
Marc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Package: kaddressbook
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The kaddressbook package is currently not installable with Debian sid. When I
attempt to do so, I get the
following error message:
zitpcx6184:~# apt-get install kaddressbook
Reading package lists... Done
Building
Hi Laszlo,
Thanks for your answer!
Would it be possible for subversion to nevertheless allow me to continue
with this operations? Or is that strictly forbidden by libneon?
Simon
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
limit package aptitude apt
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'aptitude',
'apt'
Limit currently set to 'package':'aptitude', 'apt'
reassign 549312 apt
Bug #549312 [aptitude] aptitude: cdrom segfaults on several
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 12:36:37PM +0100, ael law_ence@ntlworld.com was
heard to say:
1) An entry in /var/log/messages:
Oct 2 10:48:44 conquest3 kernel: cdrom[4987]: segfault at 200 ip b807b71d sp
bf
a34890 error 4 in ld-2.9.so[b8068000+1c000]
Oct 2 10:48:56 conquest3 kernel:
Included is a patch that moves the previous fix to a location before the
settings get applied.
Marc.
diff -Naur backuppc-3.1.0.ori/lib/BackupPC/CGI/EditConfig.pm backuppc-3.1.0/lib/BackupPC/CGI/EditConfig.pm
--- backuppc-3.1.0.ori/lib/BackupPC/CGI/EditConfig.pm 2009-10-05 08:04:01.0
Package: nagios3-cgi
Version: 3.2.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (101,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel:
Hi!
The two lines in /lib/udev/rules.d/85-hwclock.rules didn't change a thing for
me. Btw, I'm using the 2.6.30er kernel from here:
http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel sid main
Since the last Debian update, however, the fsck problem doesn't
seem to appear anymore.
My guess is
Attached is the Ubuntu patch from Stefan Potyra sistp...@ubuntu.com
that includes what's already in the bug plus additional changes to get it to
build. Obviously the debian/changelog entry would have to be reworked for
Debian, but I think the patch is generally suitable.
Scott K
diff -u
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
tags 545593 + patch
Bug #545593 [fgfs-atlas] fgfs-atlas: FTBFS: Atlas.cxx:32:10: error: #include
expects FILENAME or FILENAME
Added tag(s) patch.
End of message,
Daniel Burrows wrote:
# ps -C cdrom
PID TTY TIME CMD
5845 pts/000:00:00 cdrom
conquest3:~# gdb aptitude 5845
You'll probably have better luck if you debug /usr/lib/cdrom instead
of aptitude. :) I don't know if that'll help much, though; it doesn't
have debugging symbols
Your message dated Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:17:31 +
with message-id e1muqff-0004xu...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#549571: fixed in corosync 1.0.0-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #549571,
regarding corosync: Incorrect init.d script dependencies
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:19:04 +
with message-id e1muqha-0005ck...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#485306: fixed in mboxcheck-applet 0.3-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #485306,
regarding Useless dependency on python-gnome2-extras
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:17:31 +
with message-id e1muqff-0004xy...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#549636: fixed in corosync 1.0.0-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #549636,
regarding libopenais-legacy-dev and libcorosync-dev: error when trying to
install together
to be
Your message dated Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:17:31 +
with message-id e1muqff-0004xw...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#549634: fixed in corosync 1.0.0-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #549634,
regarding openais-legacy and corosync: error when trying to install together
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:18:32 +
with message-id e1muqge-00057c...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#545833: fixed in hdf-eos5 5.1.12.dfsg.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #545833,
regarding hdf-eos5: FTBFS due to missing B-D
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:18:26 +
with message-id e1muqgy-000564...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#546352: fixed in hdf-eos4 2.16v1.00.dfsg.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #546352,
regarding hdf-eos4 - FTBFS: autoreconf: Command not found
to be marked as done.
This
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
notfound 549585 mandos/1.0.12-1
Bug #549585 [udev] udev: creates /dev/{u,}random with too strict permissions
Bug No longer marked as found in versions mandos/1.0.12-1.
package udev
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
Your message dated Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:18:17 +
with message-id e1murct-0003qj...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#493352: fixed in gdebi 0.5.9debian1
has caused the Debian Bug report #493352,
regarding gdebi-gtk doesn`t want to install packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:18:17 +
with message-id e1murct-0003qj...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#493352: fixed in gdebi 0.5.9debian1
has caused the Debian Bug report #493352,
regarding gdebi-gtk cannot install packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:43:36 +
with message-id e1muray-0006n5...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#542551: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.31-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #542551,
regarding linux-image-2.6.30-1-686: System lockup (kernel freeze, soft lockup)
on
Package: udev
Version: 146-3
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
udev uses a screwy signal mask of fffe7ffbfeff when it's running,
and when it calls child processes these child processes inherit the
same signal mask. One of the programs called by udev is ifup, which
Your message dated Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:43:36 +
with message-id e1muray-0006n5...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#542551: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.31-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #542551,
regarding linux-image-2.6.30-1-686: Dell PowerEdge 2400 with PERC RAID 2/Si and
Your message dated Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:43:36 +
with message-id e1muray-0006mp...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#539215: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.31-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #539215,
regarding parisc/kernel: ensure broadcast tlb purge runs single threaded
to be
Your message dated Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:43:35 +
with message-id e1murax-0006mb...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#494119: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.31-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #494119,
regarding binary firmware in drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/af9005-script.h
to be marked
Your message dated Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:43:36 +
with message-id e1muray-0006n1...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#541702: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.31-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #541702,
regarding linux-image-2.6.30-1-686: e100 is missing a dependency on
linux-firmware
Your message dated Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:32:29 +
with message-id e1murqd-0005ng...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#541555: fixed in service-discovery-applet 0.4.4-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #541555,
regarding service-discovery-applet: uses python-gnome2-desktop which is going
Your message dated Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:32:29 +
with message-id e1murqd-0005ne...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#485314: fixed in service-discovery-applet 0.4.4-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #485314,
regarding Useless dependency on python-gnome2-extras
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:43:36 +
with message-id e1muray-0006mz...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#541630: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.31-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #541630,
regarding r128: Missing initialisation tests; missing firmware or deliberate
Your message dated Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:43:36 +
with message-id e1muray-0006n1...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#541702: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.31-1~experimental.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #541702,
regarding Should warn about missing firmware on upgrade
to be marked as done.
This
Package: scalapack-pvm-test
Version: 1.8.0-3.1
Severity: grave
The scalapack source package in unstable has stopped building scalapack1-pvm,
but scalapack-pvm-test still has a versioned dependency on it. It looks like
scalapack-pvm-test should also be dropped.
I believe this is the main blocker
Hi Muammar,
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 06:20, Muammar El Khatib
muammarelkha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sandro,
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:22 AM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
If not, I will package the new SVN
version and maybe you can try it to see if problem still.
Sure!
Could you
Package: evince
Version: 2.26.2-2
Justification: renders package unusable
Severity: grave
*** Please type your report below this line ***
On startup one gets: evince: symbol lookup
error: /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0: undefined symbol: g_regex_unref
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Source: spamassassin
Version: 3.2.5-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
`/build
Source: ocaml-expat
Version: 0.9.1+debian1-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules
Source: ocaml-fileutils
Version: 0.3.0-14
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory
Source: sugar-pippy-activity
Version: 25-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies
Source: xmlrpc-light
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
Source: epsilon
Version: 0.5.12-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
running install_scripts
creating
/build
Source: labplot
Version: 1.6.0.2-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
if /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode
Source: geda-gattrib
Version: 1:1.4.3-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I
Source: ocaml-bjack
Version: 0.1.2-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering directory
`/build
Source: shermans-aquarium
Version: 3.0.1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
cc -o shermans_applet fish.o
Source: gtk+extra2
Version: 2.1.1-6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode
Source: ibus-table-easy
Version: 1.2.0.20090902-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory
Source: sitecopy
Version: 1:0.16.6-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
Source: gri
Version: 2.12.19-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
** Using build dependencies supplied
Source: mail-notification
Version: 5.4.dfsg.1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
cc -c -o build/src/liborg
Source: evolution-sharp
Version: 0.20.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules
Source: archivemail
Version: 0.7.2-6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
Source: gem
Version: 1:0.90.0.1-2.3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
g++ -c -fPIC -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -I/usr
Source: kazehakase
Version: 0.5.6-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode
Source: libembperl-perl
Version: 2.2.0-3.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[4]: Entering directory
Source: ocamldap
Version: 2.1.8-6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory
`/build/user
Source: wxwidgets2.8
Version: 2.8.7.1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/build/user-wxwidgets2.8_2.8.7.1-2
Source: guile-gnome-platform
Version: 2.16.1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/bin/bash ../../../libtool
Source: davfs2
Version: 1.4.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
Source: camlimages
Version: 1:3.0.1-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory
`/build
Source: nautilus-sendto
Version: 1.1.5-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I
Source: hdf-eos5
Version: 5.1.12.dfsg.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory
Source: ledit
Version: 2.01-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/user
Source: pxp
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091005 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering directory
`/build/user
1 - 100 of 263 matches
Mail list logo
