Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 node-once
Bug #841274 [node-once] node-once: missing dependency on node-wrappy makes a
lot of packages to FTBFS
Bug #841321 [node-once] node-once: missing dependency on node-wrappy makes a
lot of packages to FTBFS
Bug #841322 [node-once] node-once:
control: reassign -1 node-once
Its caused by node-once missing dependency on node-wrappy
> make[1]: Entering directory
> '/home/lamby/temp/cdt.20161019103506.HYMipgpTLB.db.node-define-property/node-define-property-0.2.5'
> mocha
> module.js:327
> throw err;
> ^
>
> Error:
Your message dated Thu, 20 Oct 2016 05:00:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#841290: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #841281,
regarding gkeyring: Missing dependency on python-gnomekeyring
to be marked as done.
This
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 840575 normal
Bug #840575 [sbuild] sbuild should Depends: gnupg (>= 2.1)
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
840575:
Source: cf-python
Version: 1.3.2+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Builds of cf-python in minimal environments geared towards building
only its architecture-dependent python-cf binary package (as on the
autobuilders) have been
Your message dated Thu, 20 Oct 2016 01:29:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#840177: fixed in qconf 2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #840177,
regarding qconf: FTBFS: mkdir: cannot create directory '/usr/share/qconf/':
Permission denied
to be
Hi Gerardo,
Thanks! I'm fixing it.
Best regards,
--
Paulo Henrique de Lima Santana (phls)
Membro da Comunidade Curitiba Livre
Fone: +55 (41) 9198-1897
Site: http://www.phls.com.br
GNU/Linux user: 228719 GPG ID: 0443C450
Apoie a campanha pela igualdade de gênero #HeForShe (#ElesPorElas)
Package: pepperflashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1.8.1+deb8u1
Severity: critical
Install is currently failing.
Maybe the paths within the upstream deb have changed?
Here's what the postinst said:
Setting up pepperflashplugin-nonfree (1.8.1+deb8u1) ...
converted
Your message dated Thu, 20 Oct 2016 00:24:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#831143: fixed in hmat-oss 1.2.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #831143,
regarding hmat-oss: FTBFS with GCC 6: compression.cpp:717:25: error: there are
no arguments to
Your message dated Thu, 20 Oct 2016 00:21:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#789988: fixed in eclipse-mylyn-tasks-github 3.3.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #789988,
regarding FTBFS: The import org.eclipse.egit.ui.internal.FilteredCheckboxTree
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 23:09:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#841197: fixed in maven-enforcer 1.4.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #841197,
regarding maven-enforcer: makes several packages to FTBFS with "Plugin
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 23:09:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#841197: fixed in maven-enforcer 1.4.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #841197,
regarding maven-enforcer: makes several packages to FTBFS with "Plugin
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 23:09:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#841197: fixed in maven-enforcer 1.4.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #841197,
regarding maven-enforcer: makes several packages to FTBFS with "Plugin
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 23:09:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#841197: fixed in maven-enforcer 1.4.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #841197,
regarding maven-enforcer: makes several packages to FTBFS with "Plugin
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 809566 + help
Bug #809566 [src:eclipse-mylyn] eclipse-mylyn: FTBFS: Unsatisfied import
package javax.mail_0.0.0.
Added tag(s) help.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
809566:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 808485 + help
Bug #808485 [src:eclipse-pydev] eclipse-pydev: FTBFS: Missing required plug-in
org.python_0.0.0.
Added tag(s) help.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
808485:
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 22:47:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#831857: fixed in libupnp 1:1.6.19+git20160116-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #831857,
regarding libupnp: CVE-2016-6255: write files via POST
to be marked as done.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 831097 + pending
Bug #831097 [src:eclipse-pydev] eclipse-pydev: FTBFS with GCC 6:
plugins/org.python.pydev/pysrc/pydevd_attach_to_process/linux/attach_linux.c:237:25:
error: expected initializer before 'pydevdTracingMod'
Added tag(s)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 841197
>
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 22:27:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#813419: fixed in eclipse-egit 3.7.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #813419,
regarding eclipse-egit: FTBFS: generateScript: Some inter-plug-in dependencies
have not
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 22:27:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#817880: fixed in eclipse-cdt 8.6.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #817880,
regarding eclipse-cdt: FTBFS: [javac] 209 problems (1 error, 208 warnings)
to be marked as
Le 20/10/2016 à 00:06, Santiago Vila a écrit :
> You are absolutely right. Sorry for the duplicates.
No need to be sorry. Your reports and the reproducible build
notifications help us greatly to detect and fix the build issues
quickly, thanks a lot for your time.
Emmanuel Bourg
It appears that there are two parts to this bug:
1. failure to deal with config files written by older versions. Nuking
~/.config/Clementine then manually redoing all of your config makes
Clementine at least continue and put its sound _somewhere_. Whether you'll
actually hear something depends
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:50:33PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 19/10/2016 à 22:31, Santiago Vila a écrit :
>
> > I have already reported a bug like this in other packages.
> > See Bug #841197 for a likely fix.
>
> ...and you'll get the same issue with all reverse dependencies of
>
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #841288 [tigervnc-common] tigervnc-common: amd64 has dep libgnutls-deb0-28
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
--
841288: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841288
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 841304 https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-10/msg00325.html
Bug #841304 [glibc] invalid code in glibc tests
Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-10/msg00325.html' from
Control: notfound -1 2.9.0-1
Control: close -1
This issue was a side effect of #757536. It went away with the upload of
eclipse/3.8.1-9
Processing control commands:
> notfound -1 2.9.0-1
Bug #832838 [src:eclipse-xsd] eclipse-xsd: FTBFS: Duplicate methods named
spliterator with the parameters () and () are inherited from the types
List and Collection
No longer marked as found in versions eclipse-xsd/2.9.0-1.
> close -1
Bug
Package: clementine
Version: 1.3.1+git240-g1a2f6e2+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Since today's upload, Clementine fails to produce any sound at all, instead
popping up a window with endlessly repeating:
GStreamer encountered a general stream error.
Le 19/10/2016 à 22:31, Santiago Vila a écrit :
> I have already reported a bug like this in other packages.
> See Bug #841197 for a likely fix.
...and you'll get the same issue with all reverse dependencies of
maven-enforcer. These bugs are duplicates of the same issue, they should
be assigned
Processing control commands:
> reassign 841197 maven-enforcer
Bug #841197 [src:libhibernate3-java] libhibernate3-java: FTBFS (Plugin
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-enforcer-plugin:1.4.1 or one of its dependencies
could not be resolved)
Bug reassigned from package 'src:libhibernate3-java' to
Control: reassign 841197 maven-enforcer
Control: reassign 841296 maven-enforcer
Control: reassign 841362 maven-enforcer
Control: reassign 841363 maven-enforcer
Control: forcemerge 841197 841296 841362 841363
Control: tags 841197 patch pending
I am going to reassign this issue to maven-enforcer
Package: src:junit4
Version: 4.12-4
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:activemq-protobuf
Version: 1.1-4
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Control: tags -1 patch pending
Hi,
I am about to upload the attached NMU to finally fix this bug. I've also
attached a patch suitable for jessie-security, and a test script I used
to create a libupnp server for testing the fix with.
Thanks,
James
/*
* Upnp CVE-2016-6255 test program
*
* This
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch pending
Bug #831857 [src:libupnp] libupnp: CVE-2016-6255: write files via POST
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
--
831857: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=831857
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Am 19.10.2016 um 17:20 schrieb Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐):
Hi all,
It looks like a problem with the wftodm binary. This is an important piece
in the creation of the fonts.
I will only have access to my PC next week Thursday (27 October 2016) to
check the C source code and replicate it on amd64.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 841342 https://github.com/rocky/zshdb/issues/8
Bug #841342 [src:zshdb] zshdb: FTBFS under some locales (eg. fr_CH.UTF-8)
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/rocky/zshdb/issues/8'.
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 841274 + patch
Bug #841274 [node-once] node-once: missing dependency on node-wrappy makes a
lot of packages to FTBFS
Bug #841321 [node-once] node-once: missing dependency on node-wrappy makes a
lot of packages to FTBFS
Bug #841322
tags 841274 + patch
thanks
Trivial patch attached.
(Not that I know anything about node, this is just the message from
Bas but translated to patch).
Thanks.--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ Package: node-once
Architecture: all
Depends:
${misc:Depends}
+ ,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 841274 node-once
Bug #841274 [node-define-property] node-define-property: FTBFS: Error: Cannot
find module 'wrappy'
Bug #841321 [node-define-property] node-collection-visit: FTBFS (Error: Cannot
find module wrappy)
Bug #841322
reassign 841274 node-once
found 841274 1.4.0-1
retitle 841274 node-once: missing dependency on node-wrappy makes a lot of
packages to FTBFS
thanks
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:47:35PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:06:54 +0200 (CEST) Santiago Vila wrote:
> > If
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 20:06:54 +0200 (CEST) Santiago Vila wrote:
> If anybody reading this could tell me how we arrived at having so many
> one-day-old unbuildable packages in unstable, I'm still curious about it.
Because node-once was updated to a new upstream release which now
requires
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #837359 [src:ocaml] ocaml: Please build libasmrun.a and libcamlrun.a with
-fPIC
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> affects -1 + botch
Bug #837359 [src:ocaml] ocaml: Please build libasmrun.a and libcamlrun.a with
-fPIC
Added
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:36:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#841340: fixed in virtualbox 5.1.8-dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #841340,
regarding invalid code in virtualbox sources
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Source: libnftnl
Version: 1.0.6-2
Severity: serious
Hi, as you know, the current package is not migrating because of testsuite
failures on BE architectures.
Unfortunately I don't have a patch, but in Ubuntu we are excluding them from
the testsuite
diff -Nru libnftnl-1.0.6/debian/rules
Hi.
The bugs I filed should now all be merged into this one, and I've used
affects with src: so that any clone of myself in a parallel universe
can see them and not file more duplicates.
If anybody reading this could tell me how we arrived at having so many
one-day-old unbuildable packages in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 841274 0.2.5-1
Bug #841274 [node-define-property] node-define-property: FTBFS: Error: Cannot
find module 'wrappy'
Bug #841321 [node-define-property] node-collection-visit: FTBFS (Error: Cannot
find module wrappy)
Bug #841322
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:40:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#806613: fixed in eclipse 3.8.1-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #806613,
regarding eclipse: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (dh_install:
eclipse-jdt missing
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:40:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#757536: fixed in eclipse 3.8.1-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #757536,
regarding eclipse: FTBFS with Java 8: Duplicate methods named spliterator with
the parameters ()
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 841274 node-define-property
Bug #841274 [src:node-define-property] node-define-property: FTBFS: Error:
Cannot find module 'wrappy'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:node-define-property' to
'node-define-property'.
No longer marked as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 841274 841321 841322 841323 841324 841325 841326 841327 841328
> 841329 841330 841331 841332 841333 841334 841335 841336 841337 841338
Bug #841274 [src:node-define-property] node-define-property: FTBFS: Error:
Cannot find module
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 841321 node-define-property
Bug #841321 [src:node-collection-visit] node-collection-visit: FTBFS (Error:
Cannot find module wrappy)
Bug reassigned from package 'src:node-collection-visit' to
'node-define-property'.
No longer marked as
Santiago Vila wrote:
> Thanks and sorry for the noise.
Really don't worry about it; was just an FYI. :)
> Assuming that this one is the real cause for all the bugs I reported,
> I'm going to merge them all into this one.
Awesome - great work.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Chris Lamb wrote:
> affects 841274 node-is-accessor-descriptor node-is-descriptor
> node-is-extendable node-is-number node-to-regex-range
> thanks
Hi.
The quoted text above is the reason I didn't see any of those bugs.
I was looking here:
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:53:04 +0200
with message-id <20161019165304.bgtsfayewrtnc...@gnuservers.com.ar>
and subject line Re: Bug#835752: dolphin: FTBFS: dh_install: missing files,
aborting
has caused the Debian Bug report #835752,
regarding dolphin: FTBFS: dh_install: missing
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:55:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#839791: fixed in qtcreator 4.1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #839791,
regarding qtcreator: builds with clang support on armel
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 18:55:50 +0200
with message-id <20161019165550.bzcl3j3dmgtb6...@gnuservers.com.ar>
and subject line Re: Bug#835726: kate: FTBFS: dh_install: missing files,
aborting
has caused the Debian Bug report #835726,
regarding kate: FTBFS: dh_install: missing files,
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:51:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#840425: fixed in mkosi 0~20161012-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #840425,
regarding mkosi: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (debian/mkosi.1: No
such file or
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 05:17:20PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > node-repeat-element: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy)
>
> This (and others) appears to be a duplicate of #841274. I used
> "affects" there, perhaps incorrectly, but at least it avoids
> duplicates.
Do you mean
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 16:37:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#841307: fixed in docker-compose 1.8.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #841307,
regarding docker-compose: Wrong dependency version for python-docker
to be marked as done.
Source: rakudo
Version: 2016.09-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid stretch
Hi,
rakudo FTBFS on arm64, powerpc and ppc64 with errors in the testsuite.
arm64 times out during the 't/04-nativecall/02-simple-args.t' test.
For powerpc the errors are:
t/04-nativecall/01-argless.t . ok
Package: bd
Version: 1.01-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
bd fails if /bin/sh is not bash on line 39
elif [ "${@: -1}" = -v ]
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable-updates'),
Source: zshdb
Version: 0.92-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs locale
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
zshdb fails to build from source in
Hi,
> node-repeat-element: FTBFS (Error: Cannot find module wrappy)
This (and others) appears to be a duplicate of #841274. I used
"affects" there, perhaps incorrectly, but at least it avoids
duplicates.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org /
clone 841316 -1
reassign -1 src:virtualbox
retitle -1 invalid code in virtualbox sources
severity 841316 important
forwarded 841316 https://gcc.gnu.org/PR78039
forcemerge 841292 841316
thanks
This code will be rejected with GCC 7; there is still discussion upstream how
much to revert in this
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 841316 -1
Bug #841316 [src:gcc-6] gcc: the last 6.2.0-7 broke the virtualbox build
Bug 841316 cloned as bug 841340
> reassign -1 src:virtualbox
Bug #841340 [src:gcc-6] gcc: the last 6.2.0-7 broke the virtualbox build
Bug reassigned from
Package: src:node-is-primitive
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-repeat-element
Version: 1.1.2+github-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-isobject
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-collection-visit
Version: 0.2.3-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-pascalcase
Version: 0.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-normalize-path
Version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-collection-visit
Version: 0.2.3-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-extend-shallow
Version: 2.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-copy-descriptor
Version: 0.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-has-values
Version: 0.1.4-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-fill-range
Version: 3.0.3-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:52:50 +0200
with message-id <20161019155250.i6n2tydvt3ovulpy@nuc>
and subject line Re: Bug#841320: node-collection-visit: FTBFS (Error: Cannot
find module wrappy)
has caused the Debian Bug report #841320,
regarding node-collection-visit: FTBFS (Error: Cannot
Package: src:node-hosted-git-info
Version: 2.1.5-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-is-dotfile
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-isexe
Version: 1.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-map-visit
Version: 0.1.5-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-map-cache
Version: 0.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-glob-parent
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-filename-regex
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Package: src:node-component-emitter
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
Hi Chris
It looks like a problem with the wftodm binary. This is an important piece
in the creation of the fonts.
I will only have access to my PC next week Thursday (27 October 2016) to
check the C source code and replicate it on amd64. Please bear with me for
a while.
Thanks for your bug
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 14:47:48 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> Source: gcc
> Version: 6.2.0-7
> Severity: serious
>
> As said, I built virtualbox correctly with 6.2.0-6 and then uploaded on
> unstable.
> The new gcc 6.2.0-7 broke the build with the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 841316 src:gcc-6
Bug #841316 [src:gcc] gcc: the last 6.2.0-7 broke the virtualbox build
Warning: Unknown package 'src:gcc'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:gcc' to 'src:gcc-6'.
No longer marked as found in versions gcc/6.2.0-7.
Ignoring
Neil,
while working a bit on libguestfs 1.34 the other day, I noticed that
the problem exists there, too.
Whereas installing the sgabios package gives us somewhat meaningful
console output, linuxboot_dma.bin is still missing. I suppose that the
newer qemu version wants to use linuxboot_dma.bin
Source: gcc
Version: 6.2.0-7
Severity: serious
As said, I built virtualbox correctly with 6.2.0-6 and then uploaded on
unstable.
The new gcc 6.2.0-7 broke the build with the following error:
kmk_builtin_rm -f -- /«PKGBUILDDIR»/out/obj/VBoxVMM/dtrace/dtrace/VBoxVMM.h.dep
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 841082 serious
Bug #841082 [epiphany-browser] epiphany-browser: bump dependency on
epiphany-browser-data
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #841307 [docker-compose] docker-compose: Wrong dependency version for
python-docker
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
841307: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841307
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Hi Santiago
>Ok, I could agree that freemat is probably not to be blamed for this.
as an llvm team member, I can say that we are already working on removing 3.6
from testing.
Yesterday 3.8 migrated, and today we already opened 4 bugs against
ftp.debian.org to make llvm-defaults migrate too.
Source: latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab
Version: 0.20050817-16
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab fails to
Source: cacti-spine
Version: 0.8.8h-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
cacti-spine fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 839791 pending
Bug #839791 [src:qtcreator] qtcreator: builds with clang support on armel
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
839791:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 841274 node-collection-visit node-component-emitter
> node-copy-descriptor node-extend-shallow node-has-values node-isobject
> node-map-visit node-repeat-element
Bug #841274 [src:node-define-property] node-define-property: FTBFS: Error:
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #840329 [src:taglib-extras] taglib-extras: FTBFS: CMake Error at
cmake/modules/FindTaglib.cmake:132 (message): Could not find Taglib
Added tag(s) patch.
--
840329: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840329
Debian Bug Tracking
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo