Processing control commands:
> tags -1 patch
Bug #1064160 [src:pngcrush] pngcrush FTBFS with libpng 1.6.42
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags -1 pending
Bug #1064160 [src:pngcrush] pngcrush FTBFS with libpng 1.6.42
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1064160:
Control: tags -1 patch
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi Marga,
I've pushed the patch used in ArchLinux to Git[1]. I could do another
NMU but I would prefer to move the package to Debian Phototools team
and I'd volunteer to do that move.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1]
Your message dated Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:11:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1060972: fixed in telepathy-farstream 0.6.2-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1060972,
regarding telepathy-farstream: FTBFS: make[3]: ***
[/usr/share/gobject-introspection-1.0/Makefile.introspection:156:
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:libhx 4.19-1
Bug #1064734 [src:hxtools] hxtools: FTBFS:
./smath/./smath/graph-fanout.c:263:(.text.startup+0x139): undefined reference
to `BUILD_BUG_ON_EXPR'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:hxtools' to 'src:libhx'.
No longer marked as found in
Control: reassign -1 src:libhx 4.19-1
Control: retitle -1 Please include upstream patch
Control: affects -1 src:hxtools
Hi Jörg,
can you please upload a new libhx either containing this upstream patch
or the new upstream release to unbreak hxtools?
Hi Sebastian,
writing to you as you bumped the severity to 'serious': could the rT
please give us an extension on the autoremoval for this particular bug.
The transition from first-filing-to-serious was unusually short notice,
and caught us in the middle of our own update of the stack.
This
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1063029 breezy
Bug #1063029 [src:rust-breezyshim] rust-breezyshim fails autopkg tests with
breezy from unstable, blocking migration
Bug reassigned from package 'src:rust-breezyshim' to 'breezy'.
No longer marked as found in versions
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Due to new xz-utils which makes this FTBFS
> severity 1063252 serious
Bug #1063252 [src:pristine-tar] pristine-tar: Always set the -T parameter for xz
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Your message dated Mon, 26 Feb 2024 06:46:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1064665: fixed in ukui-media 3.1.1.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064665,
regarding ukui-media has an undeclared file conflict on
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ukui-control-center/libaudio.so
to be marked
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1064716 breezy
Bug #1064716 [src:ros-vcstools] ros-vcstools: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error:
pybuild --test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit
code 13
Bug reassigned from package 'src:ros-vcstools' to 'breezy'.
Your message dated Mon, 26 Feb 2024 03:34:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1064683: fixed in cadaver 0.24+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064683,
regarding cadaver: FTBFS: configure: error: could not find neon
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 26 Feb 2024 03:20:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1064756: fixed in xelb 0.18+git20240212.67ae522-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064756,
regarding xelb: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [Makefile:16: xcb-screensaver.el] Error 255
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #1062456 {Done: Neutron Soutmun } [src:ipset] ipset:
NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No
Your message dated Mon, 26 Feb 2024 02:36:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1064693: fixed in slepc4py 3.19.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064693,
regarding slepc4py: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:69:
override_dh_auto_build-arch] Error 25
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 1064267 src:gnome-characters
Bug #1064267 [fontconfig] fontconfig 2.15 breaks color emoji
Added indication that 1064267 affects src:gnome-characters
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
On 2024-02-26 00:22:01 +0100, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote:
> While installing your test package I lost wifi connection, but I think
> that was not from your package but from updating network-manager from
> unstable at the same time (did dist-upgrade), which always breaks my
> network.
With the
Your message dated Mon, 26 Feb 2024 01:49:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1064514: fixed in pymatgen 2024.1.27+dfsg1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064514,
regarding pymatgen: CVE-2024-23346
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sun, 25 Feb 2024 23:35:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1064755: fixed in libflickr-api-perl 1.28-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064755,
regarding libflickr-api-perl: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 test
TEST_VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2
to be marked
Your message dated Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:20:32 +0100
with message-id <63a9793b-6056-4137-909f-e879465a7...@goirand.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#1064775: python-pycdlib: FTBFS: failed tests
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064775,
regarding python-pycdlib: FTBFS: failed tests
to be marked as done.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> Really sorry, this has fallen through the cracks.
Thanks - no problem, happens.
> Could you please confirm the version available in this repo fixes the
> issue:
>
>
Your message dated Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:14:41 +0100
with message-id <9b5a1b03-8b05-4256-a9d7-686d8c727...@goirand.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#1064774: jenkins-job-builder: FTBFS: stestr fails
directory
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064774,
regarding jenkins-job-builder: FTBFS: stestr fails
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1064761 + confirmed
Bug #1064761 [src:libsdl-perl] libsdl-perl: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error:
/usr/bin/perl Build test --verbose 1 returned exit code 255
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1064755 in libflickr-api-perl reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1064755 [src:libflickr-api-perl] libflickr-api-perl: FTBFS: dh_auto_test:
error: make -j8 test TEST_VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1064755: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064755
Debian Bug Tracking
Your message dated Sun, 25 Feb 2024 23:04:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1064723: fixed in libio-async-loop-epoll-perl 0.22-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064723,
regarding libio-async-loop-epoll-perl: FTBFS: Can't locate Test2/V0.pm in @INC
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sun, 25 Feb 2024 23:04:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1064709: fixed in libio-async-loop-glib-perl 0.22-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064709,
regarding libio-async-loop-glib-perl: FTBFS: Can't locate Test2/V0.pm in @INC
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sun, 25 Feb 2024 23:56:48 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1064700: python-stestr: FTBFS: stestr fails
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064700,
regarding python-stestr: FTBFS: stestr fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sun, 25 Feb 2024 23:58:00 +0100
with message-id <354cfcca-3290-4f82-8a08-757971247...@goirand.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#1064757: python-swiftclient: FTBFS: stestr fails
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064757,
regarding python-swiftclient: FTBFS: stestr fails
to be marked
Your message dated Sun, 25 Feb 2024 22:51:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1064684: fixed in libio-async-loop-mojo-perl 0.07-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064684,
regarding libio-async-loop-mojo-perl: FTBFS: Can't locate Test2/V0.pm in @INC
to be marked as done.
This means
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1064723 in libio-async-loop-epoll-perl reported by you has been fixed in
the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1064723 [src:libio-async-loop-epoll-perl] libio-async-loop-epoll-perl:
FTBFS: Can't locate Test2/V0.pm in @INC
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1064723: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064723
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1064709 [src:libio-async-loop-glib-perl] libio-async-loop-glib-perl:
FTBFS: Can't locate Test2/V0.pm in @INC
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1064709: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064709
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1064709 in libio-async-loop-glib-perl reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1064684 in libio-async-loop-mojo-perl reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1064684 [src:libio-async-loop-mojo-perl] libio-async-loop-mojo-perl:
FTBFS: Can't locate Test2/V0.pm in @INC
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1064684: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064684
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #1064377 [tcl-expect] tcl-expect: identified for time_t transition but no
ABI in shlibs
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
1064377: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064377
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: severity -1 normal
Note that there are no reverse-dependencies in the archive that link against
libexpect, so I think we can downgrade this bug (or close wontfix, at the
maintainer's discretion).
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1064680 swig 4.2.0-1
Bug #1064680 [src:subversion] SWIG_snprintf not defined for ruby/tcl bindings
Bug reassigned from package 'src:subversion' to 'swig'.
No longer marked as found in versions subversion/1.14.3-1.
Ignoring request to
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 swig/4.2.0-1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> affects -1 src:subversion
Bug #1064680 [src:subversion] subversion: FTBFS:
:86:in
`require':
/<>/BUILD/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/libsvn_swig_ruby/.libs/libsvn_swig_ruby-1.so.1:
Control: reassign -1 swig/4.2.0-1
Control: affects -1 src:subversion
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/swig/swig/issues/2751
Control: retitle -1 SWIG_snprintf not defined for ruby/tcl bindings
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 08:33:47PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> >
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:06:33 +0100 matte.mb2006.9...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:18:29 +0100 Andreas Beckmann
> wrote:
> > On 18/02/2024 17.06, matte.mb2006.9...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-stable-announce/2024/02/msg2.html
> >
> > > The update is
Your message dated Sun, 25 Feb 2024 21:11:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1064746: fixed in rust-async-executor 1.5.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064746,
regarding rust-async-executor: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable:
librust-async-io-1+default-dev
to be marked as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # ftbfs
> severity 1062954 serious
Bug #1062954 [src:syndication] : NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> retitle 1062954 syndication: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition
Bug #1062954
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/thp/urlwatch/pull/786
Bug #1064736 [src:urlwatch] urlwatch: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild
--test --test-pytest -i python{version} -p "3.12 3.11" returned exit code 13
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
Owner: max...@werlen.fr
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/thp/urlwatch/pull/786
Hi,
The bug is linked to lxml > 5 where the evaluate function disappeared.
The bug is already known upstream: https://github.com/thp/urlwatch/issues/783
The fix is easy to backport, while waiting for a new
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1064598 grave
Bug #1064598 [yagv] yagv: crashes with "module 'pyglet.graphics' has no
attribute 'vertex_list'"
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Your message dated Sun, 25 Feb 2024 21:21:53 +0100
with message-id
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #1064776,
regarding bogusly redirects Bugs to debian-openoff...@lists.debian.org instead
of the BTS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1064776 serious
Bug #1064776 [src:libreoffice] bogusly redirects Bugs to
debian-openoff...@lists.debian.org instead of the BTS
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> found 1064776 4:24.2.0-1
Bug #1064776 [src:libreoffice] bogusly
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1064724 + confirmed upstream
Bug #1064724 [src:yapet] yapet: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 check
"TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j8 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2
Added tag(s) confirmed and upstream.
> forwarded 1064724
Hi,
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 11:31:37 +0100 Chris Hofstaedtler
wrote:
Paul Gevers noted that src:pdns's autopkgtests fail every so often
on a large amd64 debci worker and on s390x workers. Apparently a
similar problem can be seen in src:pdns-recursor's debci runs.
The issue (or at least some
Source: python-pycdlib
Version: 1.12.0+ds1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: pymupdf
Version: 1.23.7+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
Source: jenkins-job-builder
Version: 3.11.0-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: chemicaltagger
Version: 1.6.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: hugo
Version: 0.122.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: minexpert2
Version: 9.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: tox-delay
Version: 0.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: ruby-faraday-middleware-multi-json
Version: 0.0.6-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: gir-rust-code-generator
Version: 0.18.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: cairo-dock-plug-ins
Version: 3.4.1+git20201022.a0d3415c-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: flask-basicauth
Version: 0.2.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: dune-grid
Version: 2.9.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering
Source: libhttp-nio-java
Version: 1.1.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: tailspin
Version: 3.0.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: xelb
Version: 0.18-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: ruby-typhoeus
Version: 1.4.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> [31mFailure/Error:
Source: python-swiftclient
Version: 1:4.4.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: libflickr-api-perl
Version: 1.28-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: dolphin-emu
Version: 5.0-19870+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd
Source: ruby-batch-loader
Version: 2.0.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: ruby-elasticsearch-model
Version: 7.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: bornagain
Version: 21.1+ds3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: pymatgen
Version: 2024.1.27+dfsg1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: guix
Version: 1.4.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> SKIP: tests/guix-build
>
Source: libpappsomspp
Version: 0.9.24-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: libgnatcoll-db
Version: 23.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: rust-async-executor
Version: 1.5.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: liquidctl
Version: 1.13.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
>
Source: ruby-sinatra
Version: 3.0.5-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cannot load such
Source: python-typing-extensions
Version: 4.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: ffmpeg
Version: 7:6.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld:
Source: golang-gocloud
Version: 0.24.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: urlwatch
Version: 2.28-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
> dh
Source: python3-defaults
Version: 3.11.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: pkcs11-provider
Version: 0.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering
Source: hxtools
Version: 20231224-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld:
Source: sdcc
Version: 4.2.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: stdgpu
Version: 1.3.0+git20220507.32e0517-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd
Source: quilt
Version: 0.67+really0.67-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: davfs2
Version: 1.6.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> checking whether to use
Source: 0ad
Version: 0.0.26-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Creating Python 3
Source: erlang-p1-xml
Version: 1.1.49-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: yapet
Version: 2.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering directory
Source: libio-async-loop-epoll-perl
Version: 0.22-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: rocm-hipamd
Version: 5.2.3-13
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Generating docs for
Source: ruby-capybara
Version: 3.36.0+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: ros-vcstools
Version: 0.1.42-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: buildlog-consultant
Version: 0.0.34-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: pyfltk
Version: 1.3.9+repack-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: jss
Version: 5.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240224 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
