clone 518975 -1
reassign -1 dictionaries-common-dev
retitle -1 should guard update-openoffice-dicts call with -x
severity -1 wishlist
tags 518975 + moreinfo help
thanks
Hi,
Agustin Martin wrote:
[...]
dpkg: dependency problems prevent removal of dictionaries-common:
myspell-en-us
tag 520944 + confirmed
tag 520944 + help
thanks
{ CC'ing debian-python }
Hi,
Adrià Cereto Massagué wrote:
the problem seems to be specifically in the module pyuno. Here's the
traceback
in an interactive python shell:
Python 2.5.4 (r254:67916, Feb 18 2009, 03:00:47)
[GCC 4.3.3] on
Hi,
Chris Cheney wrote:
Apparently they did not fix this in ooo-build-3-0-1 for whatever
reason...
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448776
how exactly does that have to do with 520944? In 3.0.1 it works.
In 3.1 it does not. With Python 2.*5*.
When I build with python 2.6 I of
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Chris Cheney wrote:
Apparently they did not fix this in ooo-build-3-0-1 for whatever
reason...
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448776
how exactly does that have to do with 520944? In 3.0.1 it works.
In 3.1 it does not. With Python 2.*5*.
When
retitle 521741 conflicting build-deps: libraptor1-dev / libcurl4-openssl-dev
tag 521741 + sid
thanks
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Your message dated Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:21:13 +
with message-id e1loecd-ps...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#521741: fixed in openoffice.org
Hi,
Philipp Kern wrote:
/build/buildd-openoffice.org_3.0.1-9-i386-T7P7Im/openoffice.org-3.0.1/ooo-build/build/OOO300_m15/binfilter/bf_starmath/source/starmath_smmod.cxx:277:
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if
Hi,
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
Your package writer2latex seems failing to build from source in a pbuilder
sid
chroot :
[javac] --
[javac] 16. ERROR in /home/drazzib/Dev/debian-
pkg/work/rebuild/build/writer2latex/writer2latex-0.5.0.2/sourc
[javac]
Hi,
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
[javac] 20. ERROR in /home/drazzib/Dev/debian-
pkg/work/rebuild/build/writer2latex/writer2latex-0.5.0.2/sourc
[javac] e/writer2latex/filter/ByteArrayXStream.java (at line 39)
[javac]import
tag 521035 + pending
thanks
[ Ccing boost maintainers for reference ]
Rene Engelhard wrote:
forwarded 521035 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490044
As I Have thorsten the bt and he posted it there, boost was involved in the
backtrace [1]
and given the histories of OOo
Rene Engelhard wrote:
tag 521035 + pending
thanks
[ Ccing boost maintainers for reference ]
Rene Engelhard wrote:
forwarded 521035 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490044
As I Have thorsten the bt and he posted it there, boost was involved in the
backtrace [1]
and given
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Turned out to have a completely different root cause and that it actually also
crashes on amd64 given the right circumstances.
Workaround: apt-get install openoffice.org-ogltrans.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
reopen 524658
close 534658 1:3.1.1~ooo310m14-1
thanks
Hi,
oops, typoed the bugnr in the changelog. sorry :-)
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID:
Package: petc
Version: 3.0.0.dfsg-5
Severity: serious
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=petsc;ver=3.0.0.dfsg-5;arch=hppa;stamp=1246379358:
[...]
dpkg-source: extracting petsc in petsc-3.0.0.dfsg
dpkg-source: info: unpacking petsc_3.0.0.dfsg.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: info: applying
-maintainer upload.
+ * fix Build-Depends for new dpkg-dev (closes: #535276)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:31:34 +0200
+
petsc (3.0.0.dfsg-5) unstable; urgency=medium
* Removed babel-1.2.0 and libsidl-dev from Build-Depends (closes: #529485).
+- utf8'ize debian/copyright
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:06:37 +0200
+
myspell-sv (1.3.8-6-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Updated the address to the fsf in the copyright file.
diff -u myspell-sv-1.3.8-6/debian/copyright myspell-sv-1.3.8-6/debian/copyright
--- myspell-sv
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 09:57:05PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
kword? I think the package is useful with kword/kthesaurus from koffice2, so
not sure remove it is nice.
Ping?
Pong.
Could you remove this? koffice is gone =)
I know, and thus upgraded the bug to serious some time ago.
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 02:30:53PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
The attached patch fixes #531443.
... and introduces a FTBFSed-when-build-two-times-in-a-row bug...
Grüße/Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org |
Package: boost1.39
Version: 1.39.0-1
Severity: serious
[ normally, on boost1.39 this would be important only as boost1.39
didn't ever build for mips, but now that you changed libboost-dev
to boost 1.39 without even waiting for all architectures being at least
there makes now all packages
Package: unixodbc-dev
Version: 2.2.11-17
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
sqlext.h etc. seems to be gone in -17:
$ debdiff unixodbc-dev_2.2.11-16_amd64.deb unixodbc-dev_2.2.11-17_amd64.deb
[The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
different
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 09:56:54AM -0400, G. Allen Morris III wrote:
In any case it should not throw an exception. It should print out an
error message.
And in any case: it's not a grave (means: bug blocking the release
and eventually cause removal of the package) bug then.
Grüße/Regards,
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 11:40:59AM -0400, G. Allen Morris III wrote:
It does work on an ODT file, so it is not grave.
[ You should laso have sent this info to the bug, I do now, so that it
is recorded ]
Sorry about that. I had tried several different input formats
and could not get any
forwarded 576665 t...@openoffice.org
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:35:32PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Since 1:3.2.0-5 OOo crashes when opening a presentation document. I tried
several
of my documents but it happens with all of them, nevertheless I don't know
whether
tag 576665 + confirmed
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 01:38:23PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
[ disclaimer, didn't try yet ]
Happens here, too with the test doc...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:29:37AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
...
and the last lines repeat ad infinitum (or at least until the log occupies
several gigabytes, which is when I noticed this happening and stopped the
build process).
When I applied the patch from #594036 and built it I
reassign 595881 xulrunner-dev
found 595881 1.9.1.11-2
tag 595881 + squeeze
retitle 595881 Package 'Mozilla Plug-In API' requires 'nspr = 4.8.6' but
version of NSPR is 4.8.4
thanks
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 01:37:42AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:3.2.1-6
Package: apt-rpm
Version: 0.5.15lorg3.2-6
Severity: serious
Hi,
[...]
checking for pkg-config... no
checking for LIBXML2... configure: error: The pkg-config script could not be
found or is to old. Make sure it
is in your PATH or set the PKG_CONFIG environment variable to the full
path to
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:39:35PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hmm. Interesting. It works in my normal sid, but neither in a i386 chroot
nor
in a amd64 one (I get warnings about dbus and kded though).
And the 3.3 which worked in my normal sid doesn't work in the chroot either...
I also
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:48:27PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Othewise: simply no idea, and as long as it doesn't happen on normal
systems (asked SuSE to try it too
and it worked for them too) I would just tag this + unreproducible...
That said I got this when trying a vanilla build:
X
tag 596573 + unreproducible
severity 596573 important
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:48:27PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Othewise: simply no idea, and as long as it doesn't happen on normal
systems (asked SuSE to try it too
and it worked for them too) I would just tag
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 01:17:54AM -0400, Miguel Ruiz wrote:
I've prepared an NMU for openclipart (versioned as 0.18+dfsg-9.1) and
Eh? Did you actually read the bug? Was waiting for an answer from the submitter.
Besides that, there's no infinite oloop here, the file just takes long, so
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 09:29:58AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
You should never have uploaded it.
But now that it happened, nevermind.
(The package is orphaned anyway, so no NMU would have been needed anyways, but
a QA upload would have been possible)
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 10:06:36PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I don't see how my system is broken and/or misconfigured. At the end
of the email, you seem to imply that the broken, misconfigured part
is that I'm mixing stable and testing/unstable. My understanding is
No, I am
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:31:17AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
When libreoffice-gcj is installed, but the version of the
Java-RTE-like interface of gcj (package gcj-jre or java-gcj-compat)
that is installed is not the right one, and LibreOffice is configured
to use gcj, LibreOffice aborts
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:31:17AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Package: libreoffice-gcj
Version: 1:3.3.0~rc2-3
Severity: serious
Oh, and you really think this is a basis to block LibreOffice from entering
Debian testing unless forced in? (BTW, openoffice.org-gcj has the exact same
severity 611276 serious
forcemerge 611276 611306
thanks
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:41:22PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
Unpacking libreoffice-gcj (from .../libreoffice-gcj_1%3a3.3.0-1_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-gcj_1%3a3.3.0-1_amd64.deb (--unpack):
reassign 612494 libreoffice-dev-doc
tag 612494 + pending
thanks
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 08:27:05PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
Authentication warning overridden.
Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?)
Selecting previously deselected package libreoffice-dev-doc.
(Reading
tag 612883 + sid
tag 612883 - squeeze
notfound 612883 1:3.3.0-1
tag 612883 + wontfix
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:03:19AM +0100, Thilo Pfennig wrote:
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:3.2.1-11+squeeze2
Severity: grave
Tags: squeeze
No. sid. OOo is perfectly installable in squeeze.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:20:15AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
$ apt-get install openoffice.org
apt-get install libreoffice is what you want on sid.
Oh, and before you ask: yes, you are already on sid:
-- System Information:
Debian
tag 612883 - wontfix
tag 612883 + pending
thanks
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:20:15AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
why they are not in effect yet), but admittedly nothing for openoffice.org
metapackage.
Which, incidentally, just got removed:
OK, I reconsidered and probably will add
reassign 612931 src:openoffice.org
found 612931 1:3.3.00-1
tag 612931 + pending
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 06:03:48PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
The Debian changelog is missing in openoffice.org-common (apparently, in
all the transitional packages):
,
| % LANG=C ls -l
Package: libdf0-dev
Version: 1.0.10-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Hi,
how history repeats itself...
In a move the same as #500083 a new rasqual with librasqual3-dev was uploaded
without updating redland with it. (I see a 1.0.12-1 in experimental,
though, maybe that should be uploaded to sid)?
reassign 613050 librdf0-dev
found 613050 1.0.10-3
thanks
[ almost fullquoting for maintainers' mbox sake ]
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 03:12:05PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Package: libdf0-dev
Hrmpf. reassigning :)
Version: 1.0.10-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Hi,
how history
[ it would actually help to send also the mail to the submitter
and not only the buglog... ]
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:49:06AM -0800, Dave Beckett wrote:
This clearly shouldn't have been uploaded until raptor2 was accepted into
sid (1 month waiting), which is a dependency.
That doesn't
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 06:43:17PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 1:3.3.0-3; then
rm -rf /share
rm -rf /user
fi
Are you mad? You must nod delete arbitrary directories! Some people
store important information
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 06:47:22PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 06:43:17PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 1:3.3.0-3; then
rm -rf /share
rm -rf /user
fi
Are you mad? You must
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 06:54:22PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Saturday 12 February 2011, you wrote:
And what do people store in /share and /user?
/share is a common name for additional file systems (e.g. remote NFS
shares). You cannot assume that just because a dir is not in the FHS,
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:28:17PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Saturday 12 February 2011, Rene Engelhard wrote:
if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 1:3.3.0-3; then
BTW, it would be good if you limited the cleanup to the cases where
the problematic version was actually installed
tag 613083 + pending
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:21:41PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
If you know that this is the complete list, including 15 lines of rm
-f and 31 lines of rmdir ... 2 /dev/null || true in depth-first
order would seem best to me. Or do
I dont, it's the one I
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:46:46PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
+ rmdir /share/config2 /dev/null rmdir /share 2
/dev/null || true
2 /dev/null and || true reversed of course.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 06:45:40PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:49:06AM -0800, Dave Beckett wrote:
This clearly shouldn't have been uploaded until raptor2 was accepted into
sid (1 month waiting), which is a dependency.
That doesn't matter. raptor might
Package: ooohg
Version: 09.12a-1
Severity: serious
$ dpkg --info ooohg_09.12a-1_all.deb
neues Debian-Paket, Version 2.0.
Größe 77102144 Byte: control-Archiv= 36731 Byte.
760 Byte,18 Zeilen control
121856 Byte, 1371 Zeilen md5sums
1219 Byte,48 Zeilen * postinst
retitle 613163 broken dependencies
thanks
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 01:04:37PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
The Recommends is wrong.
a) it's libreoffice, not libreoffice.org
b) the Recommends: openoffice.org just has *any* version of openoffice.org
allowed.
Where it won't work
found 613163 09.12a-2
thanks
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 01:11:14PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
a) it's libreoffice, not libreoffice.org
This is fixed in -2.
b) the Recommends: openoffice.org just has *any* version of openoffice.org
allowed.
Where it won't work as you just install
+++ inkscape-0.48.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+inkscape (0.48.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * build against libwpg 0.2.0 (closes: #604825)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:24:22 +
+
inkscape (0.48.0-1) experimental; urgency=low
-maintainer upload.
+ * build against libwpd 0.9.0/libwpg 0.2.0/libwps 0.2.0 (closes: #604826)
+ * build-depend on libxcb-render-util0-dev
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org Sun, 13 Feb 2011 14:14:51 +0100
+
abiword (2.8.6-0.1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Jari Aalto ]
diff -u abiword-2.8.6/debian
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:36:03PM +0100, Wolfram Quester wrote:
ATM I'm preparing an upload of inkscape 0.48.1 to unstable. For this I'm
porting the patch you sent previously to the new version.
I wanted to finish this today and send the new package to my sponsor Guido
Günther, who is on
tag 613389 + moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 02:58:09PM +0100, Christophe TROESTLER wrote:
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:3.3.0-2
Severity: grave
How does this (if you would have a correct uptodate system). But
what did you do a safe-upgrade from? testing doesn't have libreoffice
and
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 03:24:37PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 02:58:09PM +0100, Christophe TROESTLER wrote:
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:3.3.0-2
Severity: grave
How does this (if you would have a correct uptodate system). But
what did you do a safe
notfound 613389 1:3.3.0-2
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 03:24:37PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 02:58:09PM +0100, Christophe TROESTLER wrote:
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:3.3.0-2
Severity: grave
How does this (if you would have a correct uptodate system
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:10:33PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
OK, I debootstrapped a wheezy and added libreoffice from snapshot.debian.org
(http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20110207T215531Z). Then I created
a Test.odt, saved it and ...
[...]
... upgraded those (one by one
tag 613389 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
OK, I debootstrapped a wheezy and added libreoffice from snapshot.debian.org
(http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20110207T215531Z). Then I created
a Test.odt, saved it and ...
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 02:58:09PM +0100, Christophe TROESTLER wrote:
ii
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:46:55PM +0100, Christophe TROESTLER wrote:
One of the point is that, pulling some packages to version
3.2.1~rc1-2, it should have pulled all dependent packages to the same
version.
True. But the dependenies on the packages you have *are* correct. There's
no
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:49:50PM +0100, Christophe TROESTLER wrote:
My former ~/.libreoffice
I replaced mine with yours - and it still works.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 07:15:52PM +0100, Christophe TROESTLER wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:18:51 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 05:49:50PM +0100, Christophe TROESTLER
wrote:
My former ~/.libreoffice
I replaced mine with yours - and it still works.
Ah
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:26:21PM +0100, Innocent De Marchi wrote:
And even if not, closoing a bug when it's not fixed is nonsense, too. This
is not
just wishlist (which can be closed if you disagree, but as you agree you
should fix
it it's not to be closed), but a real bug.
Ok. I sent
/debian/changelog
--- zemberek-ooo-1.0~rc2/debian/changelog
+++ zemberek-ooo-1.0~rc2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+zemberek-ooo (1.0~rc2-10.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * update for LibreOffice (closes: #612332)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org Thu, 17 Feb 2011
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 08:58:46AM +0200, rpnpif wrote:
Open
http://media.eduscol.education.fr/file/seminaire_STI2D/56/7/STI2D_BacSTI2D_157567.odp
Export in PDF/A-1a.
The message export to PDF is displaying in status bar and OOo freezes with
an high
CPU activity.
After some minutes,
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 09:19:07AM +, Hector Oron wrote:
Package: src:libreoffice
Version: 3.3.0~beta2-2
Severity: serious
Strictly speaking, no. (LibreOffice never built on armel yet)
Anyways... ;)
Your package FTBFS on armel
[...]
patch -p1
severity 601741 important
thanks
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 09:27:10AM +0100, Alain Rpnpif wrote:
Le 31 octobre 2010, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
Does that happen with all documents? (I doubt that), because I would
not want to handle this as a grave bug (and thuis eventually getting
squeeze
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 07:54:33PM +0100, Nicolas DEGAND wrote:
I forgot to mention that this is a regression from OpenOffice.org 3.2.1
It can't be a regression. There was no LibreOffice 3.2.1.
OpenOffice.org is an other product.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian
severity 603402 important
forwarded 603402 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31606
tag 603402 + upstream
thanks
[ please format your mail sanely, especially wrap your lines sanely after
72 chars to that it can be quoted sanely. Yes, that's your job, not
the MUAs ]
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 13,
tag 603538 + moreinfo
severity 603538 serious
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:52:27AM +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
Package: openoffice.org-core
Version: 1:3.2.1-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Wrong. It's an install failure, so it's serious per definition
reassign 603538 ure
retitle 603538 OOo binfilter registration failure with LibreOffice 3.3 ure
tag 603538 - moreinfo
tag 603538 + confirmed
tag 603538 + wontfix
severity 603538 important
severity 603549 important
merge 603538 603549
thanks
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 09:08:01AM +0100, Rene Engelhard
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:02:17AM +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
And the obvious notice: In -8 nothing in that place changed.
ii ttf-opensymbol 2:2.3.9+LibO3.3.0~beta2-2 OpenSymbol TrueType font
ii ure1.7.0+LibO3.3.0~beta2-2 LibreOffice UNO runtime
environmen
I
severity 604128 important
reassign 604128 perl
thanks
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 03:27:44PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: Can't extract name and version from library name
`libvclplug_genl3.so'
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: Can't extract name and version from library
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:29:37AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
and the last lines repeat ad infinitum (or at least until the log occupies
several gigabytes, which is when I noticed this happening and stopped the
build process).
Looks like an inkscape bug to me? inkscape shouldn't do
severity 613389 important
thanks
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 04:59:12PM +0100, Christophe TROESTLER wrote:
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:50:18 +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
I upgraded an i386 sid box a minute ago, including libreoffice, now at
version 1:3.3.1~rc1-2 (most packages at least). A short
tag 616011 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 07:58:49PM +, Pascal Giard wrote:
Trying to export a document to a MediaWiki server results in an error:
The MediaWiki export filter cannot be found. Choose 'Tools-XML Filter
Settings'
to install the filter, or use the setup to
tag 616011 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 09:25:58PM +, Pascal Giard wrote:
Also note that for raising that error, you don't need to connect to
any mediawiki server.
Simply selecting Send/To MediaWiki... will raise the error.
Mmh, OK.
Then it's unreproducible here.
Hi again,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 12:16:08AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
ii openjdk-6-jre [java5-runtim 6b18-1.8.5-1 OpenJDK Java runtime, using
Hotspo
ii sun-java6-jre [java5-runtim 6.24-1 Sun Java(TM) Runtime
Environment (
Just out of curiosity: what of those is set
tag 616093 + unreproducible
tag 616093 + moreinfo
severity 616093 grave
thanks
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 02:22:23PM +0100, Martin Künstner wrote:
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:3.3.1-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Bullshit. Read the bug severities again. If at
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 02:04:17AM +, Pascal Giard wrote:
As soon as I get back to work (on Thursday), I'll try the obvious i.e.
reinstall the package and make sure libreoffice is restarted.
(I doubt the latter is the issue as the command appeared in the menu
(Send/To MediaWiki...)
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 03:55:37PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
on the file open dialog libre office get stuck and the whole system gets
frozen
no user interaction is possible any more
mous is moving but every otner action is no more possible
you cant even change to console via
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 03:48:48PM +, Pascal Giard wrote:
It's a possibility; I can not rule that out.
If I understand correctly, doing a reinstall on all installed
libreoffice packages should fix things?
I don't know. Worth a try, though.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 08:17:55PM +0100, Martin Künstner wrote:
I opened a terminal with the syslog open and than started libreoffice
and i didn't see anything abnormal there.
Of course not, LibO doesn't write to syslog, neither does X.
Is there a log to post?
A log for a GUI app?
Hi again,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 08:47:48PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 08:17:55PM +0100, Martin Künstner wrote:
I opened a terminal with the syslog open and than started libreoffice
and i didn't see anything abnormal there.
Of course not, LibO doesn't write
severity 616093 important
reassign 616093 xserver-xorg-video-nouveau,linux-image-2.6.37-2-amd64
affects 616093 libreoffice
thanks
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 08:17:55PM +0100, Martin Künstner wrote:
on my system this bug is reproducable.
How can i provide further information.
He wrote me a
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 03:26:25PM +, Pascal Giard wrote:
However, doing things this way, libreoffice-wiki-publisher got
installed before python-uno and thus I don't see it getting registered
(missing predepend there?).
A Java thing doesn't need the python API bindings.
(And no, that
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 04:41:45PM +, Pascal Giard wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org wrote:
[...]
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 03:26:25PM +, Pascal Giard wrote:
[...]
More ideas?
No. Except maybe a somewhat broken extension registry..
Hmmm
Package: openoffice.org-thesaurus-it
Severity: serious
# apt-get install openoffice.org-thesaurus-it
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation
Package: openoffice.org-thesaurus-pl
Severity: serious
# apt-get install openoffice.org-thesaurus-pl
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation
Package: openoffice.org-ctl-he
Severity: serious
[ actually I do think this package never made any sense, especially
since OOo did switch to LTR mode if the locale was set correctly, but
anyway ]
# apt-get install openoffice.org-ctl-he
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency
severity 617596 important
retitle 617596 Base gets confused on data input with two columns differring
just in case
thanks
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 05:37:59PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 03/09/2011 04:27 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 03:42:18PM -0500, Daniel
severity 617682 important
thanks
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 04:37:24PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
severity 617682 grave
Actually, I think this is only important either way. (specific option,
can be workarounded by not using it)
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc
Package: docvert-libreoffice
Severity: serious
Hi,
I admit that it might have been in my patch, but I obviously haven't
had in mind that dovcert-openoffice.org at some time might become
a transitional package.
Which now results in:
00:28 jcristau _rene_: grrr. openoffice.org now builds
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:24:28AM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
PS: dist-upgrade chose to remove dmaths and report-builder from
openoffice.org instead of upgrading them to libreoffice, but that's not
as bad.
This I btw cannot reproduce. squeeze - wheezy with both -dmaths and
-report-builder
Package: libgcj-bc
Version: 4.4.5-7
Severity: serious
(sid)root@frodo:/# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
libgcj-bc
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed,
tag 624997 - wheezy
thanks
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:39:43PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: writerperfect
Version: 0.8.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
No. gcc 4.6 is not in wheezy. If you find gcc 4.6 FTBFSes please take
care on where and when this stuff actually takes place.
tag 625118 - wheezy
thanks
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:39:42PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: wps2odt
Version: 0.2.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
No. gcc 4.6 is not in wheezy. If you find gcc 4.6 FTBFSes please take
care on where and when this stuff actually takes place.
severity 619163 important
# no into here - nothing to reproduce
tag 619163 + moreinfo
tag 619163 + unreproducible
thanks
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 01:30:14PM -0400, bob wrote:
^^^
what if you could send a proper mail?
Package: libreoffice
Version:
501 - 600 of 1300 matches
Mail list logo
