> We had just that when slink was released, and we decided that was "not
> optimal".
oh well. was this because of feedback i.e people without a clue looking
at the sitelist, downloading and then having no idea what to do ?
> I've changed it to "all except arm" instead ;-)
ta.
> http://www.u
> > NOTE: USE OF THESE SITES IS DISCOURAGED!! If possible, use the Pseudo-Image Kit.
> >
> You understand that a site can offer more than one service. The average
> windows user doesn't. (At least until he installs Debian ;-)
ok - i think this means
"we aren't going to change this, go away"
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> > --cut here-
> > Australia, AARNet, hosted at http://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/">AARNet's
>Mirror Project (only for .au & .nz)
>
> Ah, you just registered the city AARNet to be listed first? ;-))
don't care - list u
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, Heikki Vatiainen wrote:
> Maybe you should take another look ;-) c.d.o does have
> 2.2_rev0_CDa and that's where I got them yesterday. Since they
> were available, I thought it was appropriate to get them.
doh - sorry - must have missed spotting it when i looked, because
Burning an ISO CD from Toast under Mac OS works fine. You can even mount
the image, like you can on Linux using the loopback driver. (Mac and
Linux are _both_ capable, sophisticated OSs, nothing like Microsloth).
You are probably safe merely from having downloaded the file with its
'.iso' ex
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, jason andrade wrote:
> Another thing - is this really true ?
>
> NOTE: USE OF THESE SITES IS DISCOURAGED!! If possible, use the Pseudo-Image Kit.
>
>
> that's actually not true for us - we aren't discouraging anyone
> from using our site - if they want to use the PIK th
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, jason andrade wrote:
> i'm not sure who looks after cdimage.debian.org's web pages
> but i needed one change and also had a suggestion.
>
> suggestion: despite the really cool Q&A system to get to a
> final answer, would it be possible to link to the list of
> mirror sites
jason andrade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> out of curiousity - where are the "2.2_rev0_CDa" cds being produced ?
I can not give authorative answer since I'm not Phil, but my guess
is that they are/were also produced on cdimage.debian.org.
> i can't see any on cdimage which i thought was the aut
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, Heikki Vatiainen wrote:
> After checking all the CD images for all the architectures, I found
> two more corrupt files. The sparc images I tested were
> 2.2_rev0_CDa versions, the old 2.2_rev0 images were not tested.
> Testing included _only_ .deb files
out of curiousity -
After checking all the CD images for all the architectures, I found
two more corrupt files. The sparc images I tested were
2.2_rev0_CDa versions, the old 2.2_rev0 images were not tested.
Testing included _only_ .deb files
Here's what I found.
binary-powerpc-1_NONUS.iso
10 matches
Mail list logo
