Some observations about Debian installation

2003-11-20 Thread Otto Wyss
I'm just gone through a new Debian installation process and think I know a little bit what's wrong. 1. The current stable release (3.0r1) is just outdated. 2. There are way too many show stoppers in the testing release (3.1) installation 1. takes care that (almost) nobody uses Debian/stable for

Re: Some observations about Debian installation

2003-11-20 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes: I'm just gone through a new Debian installation process and think I know a little bit what's wrong. 1. The current stable release (3.0r1) is just outdated. 2. There are way too many show stoppers in the testing release (3.1) installation 1. takes

Re: Usage of isolinux on the beta CDs

2003-11-20 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:00:12PM +0100, Santiago Garcia Mantinan écrivait: We can build two netinst sets for now if you want, but I'd rather build test images with the last version of isolinux in debug mode before making a decision on all this, anybody objects on building this kind of images

Some observations about Debian installation

2003-11-20 Thread Otto Wyss
I'm just gone through a new Debian installation process and think I know a little bit what's wrong. 1. The current stable release (3.0r1) is just outdated. 2. There are way too many show stoppers in the testing release (3.1) installation 1. takes care that (almost) nobody uses Debian/stable for

Re: Some observations about Debian installation

2003-11-20 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes: I'm just gone through a new Debian installation process and think I know a little bit what's wrong. 1. The current stable release (3.0r1) is just outdated. 2. There are way too many show stoppers in the testing release (3.1) installation 1. takes