Hi!
There problem in the code that selects the packages to go into the cds when
we use either metapackages such as mail-transport-agent, for example, or we
give alternatives, this translates into a problem in the size of the netinst
cds, I have talked about this with Raphael already.
The thing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris schrieb:
Using that doc.tgz file you sent me the link for. It worked. I
remounted
the tmp iso image and scaned the untarred doc.tgz file.
It worked fine. Actually I had the tmp iso copied to a new directory,
deleted the old doc directory
Quoting Santiago Garcia Mantinan:
The problem was how to translate this into debian-cd code, and I did so at
gluck by hinting the list, I mean that I added a couple of good hints at
the beginning of the list so that the problematic dependencies that were
throwing a lot of unwanted stuff in the
Anyway, I'm concerned that this will probably not fit on a netinst iso
image. The current netinst iso is 106 mb (that includes the existing
2.6.5 kernel udebs; it's under 200 mb without them). To add full 2.6
support, we would need to add a vmlinux file and an initrd for the 2.6
kernel (3.9
Dear Debian CD Team,
I have two questions which I could find in neither the faq nor the
mailing list archives.
#1: what is the difference between official and unofficial CD images?
Which one should I use?
#2: I downloaded a DVD image with jigdo and tried to dd it to a DVD-RAM.
Unfortunatelly the
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2004 21:58:07 +0200 (MET_DST)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#244971: incorrect (text/plain) mime type for new installer image
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andras Gefferth schrieb:
#1: what is the difference between official and unofficial CD images?
Which one should I use?
Hi Andras!
The main difference is, that official images are build of the debian
team itself. Once they are created they are not
Jan,
thanks for your quick answer!
The main difference is, that official images are build of the debian
team itself. Once they are created they are not changed and (more
important) the are fairly tested.
If the webpage maintainer reads this:
would be good to see this in the FAQ.
Are there
8 matches
Mail list logo