Maximilian Haeussler,+33612827616
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:45 AM, GONG Jie gongjie@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Maximilian Haeussler
maximili...@gmail.com wrote:
the debian website is horribly complicated for beginners who just want to
give debian a try.
One
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Maximilian Haeussler wrote:
Please read the installation guide before you are doing installation.
[1] http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/installmanual
No. It is the other way round: One has to SELECT your architecture to
read an installation guide. Users
On Monday 14 September 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Well, as a debian-cd co-maintainer, I thought about this too, but I
didn't like the idea very much. It would mean 2 supplementary variables
that should be used instead of $CODENAME or $DI_CODENAME in various
places and that should default to
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Maximilian Haeussler wrote:
Please read the installation guide before you are doing installation.
[1] http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/installmanual
No. It is the other way round:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
It seems a bit strange to me to have a derived distribution as CD release
that's not backed up by it's own archive, and thus mirrors.
I'd say that if you want to use different codenames, you should start by
creating an archive that has those codenames.
On Wednesday 16 September 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Now, the alternative is to not create the symlinks and have a way to
tell debian-cd “well CODENAME is foo, but for boot-enabling scripts,
please use those of lenny”.
I agree that as simple-cdd is the wrapper here that has the goal of
6 matches
Mail list logo
