Re: Bug#763127: UEFI corner case - installer booted in UEFI mode, existing system in BIOS mode - PLEASE REVIEW

2014-10-01 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 01:51:25AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: >On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 00:29 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> From: Steve McIntyre >> Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 00:01:28 +0100 >> Subject: [PATCH] Recognise the new ignore_uefi flag from partman-efi >[...] >> --- a/src/system/efi.c >> +++ b

Re: Bug#763127: UEFI corner case - installer booted in UEFI mode, existing system in BIOS mode - PLEASE REVIEW

2014-10-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 00:29 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > From: Steve McIntyre > Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 00:01:28 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] Recognise the new ignore_uefi flag from partman-efi [...] > --- a/src/system/efi.c > +++ b/src/system/efi.c > @@ -28,7 +28,14 @@ int di_system_is_efi(void) > {

Re: Bug#763127: UEFI corner case - installer booted in UEFI mode, existing system in BIOS mode - PLEASE REVIEW

2014-10-01 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hang fire - one test just failed. :-( On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 12:29:40AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >Control: tag -1 +patch > >On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 02:43:53AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:34:17PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 08:46:41PM +

Re: Bug#763127: UEFI corner case - installer booted in UEFI mode, existing system in BIOS mode - PLEASE REVIEW

2014-10-01 Thread Steve McIntyre
Control: tag -1 +patch On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 02:43:53AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:34:17PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 08:46:41PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 07:50:38PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: On Sun, Sep

Re: Time for Jessie Beta 2?

2014-10-01 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 06:02, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I've discovered #763580 though, so I might revert this change for now > since I don't want to reintroduce this bug right now, and generate more > work for translators because of an errata we could and should have > avoided, since that problem was warned against al