On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 01:51:25AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 00:29 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> From: Steve McIntyre
>> Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 00:01:28 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH] Recognise the new ignore_uefi flag from partman-efi
>[...]
>> --- a/src/system/efi.c
>> +++ b
On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 00:29 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> From: Steve McIntyre
> Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 00:01:28 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Recognise the new ignore_uefi flag from partman-efi
[...]
> --- a/src/system/efi.c
> +++ b/src/system/efi.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,14 @@ int di_system_is_efi(void)
> {
Hang fire - one test just failed. :-(
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 12:29:40AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>Control: tag -1 +patch
>
>On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 02:43:53AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:34:17PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 08:46:41PM +
Control: tag -1 +patch
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 02:43:53AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 03:34:17PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 08:46:41PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>>On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 07:50:38PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sun, Sep
On 06:02, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I've discovered #763580 though, so I might revert this change for now
> since I don't want to reintroduce this bug right now, and generate more
> work for translators because of an errata we could and should have
> avoided, since that problem was warned against al
5 matches
Mail list logo