Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning

2015-05-01 Thread Cyril Brulebois
(cc+=boot) Adam D. Barratt (2015-04-30): > As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to > start planning for the first point release. AFAICT there haven't been too many reports of d-i being badly broken, so there's not much to be fixed. Here's a quick brain dump for jessi

Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning

2015-05-01 Thread Neil McGovern
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:08:59PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > May 23/24 > > Offline-ish on May 23. > Same for me. > > May 30/31 > > OK. > OK > > June 6/7 > > Offline on June 6, offline-ish on June 7. > OK > > June 13/14 > > Offline-ish on June 13. > OK > > June 20/21 > > OK.

Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning

2015-05-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[Added some missed CCs; sigh] On 2015-04-30 22:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi, As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to start planning for the first point release. We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9 really wants to take place afte

Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning

2015-05-01 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 13927 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9 > really wants to take place after 8.1, as we have some packages for which > pu > opu > stable. > May 23/24 Works > May 30/31 Works > June 6/7 Works. > June 13/14 Nope. >

Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning

2015-05-01 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:16:23PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >Hi, > >As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to >start planning for the first point release. > >We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9 >really wants to take place after 8.1, a