Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?

download.debian.org is very good. On 19 August 2015 06:08:08 CEST, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Hi Steve and others, > >Steve McIntyre (2015-08-18): >> We called our main installer images distribution site >> cdimage.debian.org a long time ago, when that was all it published >and >> most people downl

Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?

Hi all, On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 06:08:08AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Looking at the various proposals, those caught my attention: > - get.debian.org > - download.debian.org > - install.debian.org > - installer.debian.org > > I like the “action” aspect of the first 3, the last one being

Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?

Hi Steve and others, Steve McIntyre (2015-08-18): > We called our main installer images distribution site > cdimage.debian.org a long time ago, when that was all it published and > most people downloaded images of CDs. Ummm. Things have moved on in > the intervening years, and this name is lookin

Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 05:09:19PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Please reply and let's see if we can come up with a better name. download.debian.org ? -- Antonio Terceiro signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?

>>Steve Langasek wrote: >> - get.debian.org +1

Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?

> get.debian.org and redirections for every release like get.debian.org/$RELEASE > would be great. That would be perfect! get.debian.org/testing here I come! :)

Re: [RFC] Architecture detection patches in multiarch CDs

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 04:52:41PM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > >* 0001-Add-management-of-arch-detection-from-d-i-in-isolinu.patch > >This is a patch against debian-cd.git. Inclusion of ifcpu64.c32 (1.7k) >is only done on the second run (MULTIARCH=1), and the second thing this >does is to

Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 08:34:56PM +0200, Hideki Yamane wrote: >On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:15:46 +0200 >Steve Langasek wrote: >> - get.debian.org > > I prefer this since easy to understand and type :) I think it's a cool name, and my clear favourite thus far. :-) -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.

Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 01:04:17PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: >On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:19:07AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >> Steve McIntyre writes: >> >> > We called our main installer images distribution site >> > cdimage.debian.org a long time ago, when that was all it published and >> >

8.2 and 7.9 planning

Hi, We're somewhat overdue for both 8.2 and 7.9 now (in that order). Some potential September dates: 5/6th - okay for me 12/13th - the 12th doesn't work for me until at least mid-afternoon 19th/20th - looks okay 26th/27th - looks okay >From a quick chat, it appears that the CD team are okay with

Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?

On Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:15:46 +0200 Steve Langasek wrote: > - get.debian.org I prefer this since easy to understand and type :) -- Hideki Yamane

Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 05:34:39PM +0100, Majid HUSSAIN wrote: > hi there, > hows about > iso.debian.org? > it makes sence to me at least. > thoughts? But it also has usb compatible images, pxe and other netboot images, hd images, etc. It is not just ISOs. -- Len Sorensen

Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 09:19:07AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Steve McIntyre writes: > > > We called our main installer images distribution site > > cdimage.debian.org a long time ago, when that was all it published and > > most people downloaded images of CDs. Ummm. Things have moved on in > >

Re: [RFC] Architecture detection patches in multiarch CDs

OdyXLe samedi, 15 août 2015, 16.52:41 Didier '' Raboud a écrit : > After three DebConfs discussing this (but only actually using DebConf > space/time to actually work on it), and taking the opportunity of the > immediate post stretch-alpha2 period, I'd like to discuss two > architecture detection p

Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?

hi there, hows about iso.debian.org? it makes sence to me at least. thoughts? Majid On 18/08/2015, Simon Kainz wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Well, i created a Wiki Page for this, making it probably easier to > decide upon things. I copied the already proposed name

Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 06:15:46PM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote: > - get.debian.org get.debian.org and redirections for every release like get.debian.org/$RELEASE would be great.

Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Well, i created a Wiki Page for this, making it probably easier to decide upon things. I copied the already proposed names there: https://wiki.debian.org/NewNameForCDImage Bye, Simon Am 2015-08-18 um 18:15 schrieb Steve Langasek: > On Tue, Aug

Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?

Steve McIntyre writes: > We called our main installer images distribution site > cdimage.debian.org a long time ago, when that was all it published and > most people downloaded images of CDs. Ummm. Things have moved on in > the intervening years, and this name is looking more silly over time: >

Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 05:09:19PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Hey folks, > We called our main installer images distribution site > cdimage.debian.org a long time ago, when that was all it published and > most people downloaded images of CDs. Ummm. Things have moved on in > the intervening year

cdimage?? What should we call it?

Hey folks, We called our main installer images distribution site cdimage.debian.org a long time ago, when that was all it published and most people downloaded images of CDs. Ummm. Things have moved on in the intervening years, and this name is looking more silly over time: * lots of people are u