Re: Scheduling 10.1 and maybe 9.10

2019-07-29 Thread Andy Simpkins
Ok I'll mark it on family calendar On 29 July 2019 10:47:09 GMT-03:00, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >Ok, we have a winner. Let's make them both 7th September so press >aren't >under too much pressure. > >-- >Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org >Debian Developer

Re: Scheduling 10.1 and maybe 9.10

2019-07-29 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Ok, we have a winner. Let's make them both 7th September so press aren't under too much pressure. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3

Re: Scheduling 10.1 and maybe 9.10

2019-07-29 Thread Mark Hymers
On Sat, 27, Jul, 2019 at 08:21:57PM -0300, Jonathan Wiltshire spoke thus.. > On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 08:36:30PM -0300, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 07:35:01PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > > - Auguest 31st > > > - September 7th > > > > These look like the two

Bug#933299: isohybrid.pl should not be architecture dependent

2019-07-29 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, > I'll also look into whether we need both the perl > script and the binary of "isohybrid" If it is for functionality, then not. If it is about portability, then only if isohybrid.c stays restricted to the architectures which could boot via isolinux.bin. If it is about backward