Re: 2.2 CD images appearing

2000-08-19 Thread jason andrade
> We had just that when slink was released, and we decided that was "not > optimal". oh well. was this because of feedback i.e people without a clue looking at the sitelist, downloading and then having no idea what to do ? > I've changed it to "all except arm" instead ;-) ta. > http://www.u

Re: 2.2 CD images appearing

2000-08-19 Thread jason andrade
> > NOTE: USE OF THESE SITES IS DISCOURAGED!! If possible, use the Pseudo-Image Kit. > > > You understand that a site can offer more than one service. The average > windows user doesn't. (At least until he installs Debian ;-) ok - i think this means "we aren't going to change this, go away"

Re: 2.2 CD images appearing

2000-08-19 Thread jason andrade
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, J.A. Bezemer wrote: > > --cut here- > > Australia, AARNet, hosted at http://mirror.aarnet.edu.au/">AARNet's >Mirror Project (only for .au & .nz) > > Ah, you just registered the city AARNet to be listed first? ;-)) don't care - list u

Re: 2.2 CD images appearing

2000-08-19 Thread J.A. Bezemer
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, jason andrade wrote: > Another thing - is this really true ? > > NOTE: USE OF THESE SITES IS DISCOURAGED!! If possible, use the Pseudo-Image Kit. > > > that's actually not true for us - we aren't discouraging anyone > from using our site - if they want to use the PIK th

Re: 2.2 CD images appearing

2000-08-19 Thread J.A. Bezemer
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, jason andrade wrote: > i'm not sure who looks after cdimage.debian.org's web pages > but i needed one change and also had a suggestion. > > suggestion: despite the really cool Q&A system to get to a > final answer, would it be possible to link to the list of > mirror sites

Re: 2.2 CD images appearing

2000-08-17 Thread jason andrade
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, jason andrade wrote: Another thing - is this really true ? from: http://cdimage.debian.org/ftp-mirrors.html NOTE: USE OF THESE SITES IS DISCOURAGED!! If possible, use the Pseudo-Image Kit. that's actually not true for us - we aren't discouraging anyone from using our

Re: 2.2 CD images appearing

2000-08-16 Thread jason andrade
Hi, i'm not sure who looks after cdimage.debian.org's web pages but i needed one change and also had a suggestion. suggestion: despite the really cool Q&A system to get to a final answer, would it be possible to link to the list of mirror sites for the ISOs off the front page ? change needed:

Re: 2.2 CD images appearing

2000-08-14 Thread Philip Hands
David Huggins-Daines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > ALPHA Problems: > > > > tools/boot/potato/post-boot-alpha was not executable, so I'm > > rebuilding that now. > > Let me know if it breaks unexpectedly, too - I made some changes to > support

Re: 2.2 CD images appearing

2000-08-14 Thread jason andrade
On 14 Aug 2000, Philip Hands wrote: > The 2.2 CD images are available from cdimage.debian.org. hmm. now 7 connections are full. i can't rsync more than one image at a time due to disk space limitations here.. can you see if anyone is using more than one slot and boot them off ? :-) that said,

Re: 2.2 CD images appearing

2000-08-14 Thread jason andrade
On 14 Aug 2000, Philip Hands wrote: > I was being cautious while finishing off the sparc images -- I've > upped it to 5 now. you shouldn't have told everyone :-) grrr.. @ERROR: max connections (4) reached - try again later was just getting ready to rsync the i386 images over the top too. a

Re: 2.2 CD images appearing

2000-08-14 Thread Philip Hands
jason andrade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 14 Aug 2000, Philip Hands wrote: > > > The 2.2 CD images are available from cdimage.debian.org. > > > > At present, I'm not happy about the alpha & sparc images, so until the > > images get linked to the 2.2_rev0 directory tree treat them as > > pr

Re: 2.2 CD images appearing

2000-08-14 Thread jason andrade
On 14 Aug 2000, Philip Hands wrote: > The 2.2 CD images are available from cdimage.debian.org. > > At present, I'm not happy about the alpha & sparc images, so until the > images get linked to the 2.2_rev0 directory tree treat them as > pre-release still. is there only one connection ? i just

Re: 2.2 CD images appearing

2000-08-14 Thread David Huggins-Daines
Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ALPHA Problems: > > tools/boot/potato/post-boot-alpha was not executable, so I'm > rebuilding that now. Let me know if it breaks unexpectedly, too - I made some changes to support bootable CDs on SRM but since I have nowhere near enough bandwidth t

Re: 2.2 CD images appearing

2000-08-14 Thread James Troup
Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There are no Release files --- does anyone care? Fixed, FWIW. -- James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 2.2 CD images appearing

2000-08-14 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 04:57:33PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > ARM Problems: > > There are no Release files --- does anyone care? > A problem with the non-us stuff - The scripts seem to rely on the non-us stuff to be in the original tree which isnt true for most mirrors - They seperatly mirr

Re: 2.2 CD images appearing

2000-08-14 Thread Heikki Vatiainen
Philip Hands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The 2.2 CD images are available from cdimage.debian.org. > If people could mention when they've got copies of the images, so that > others can start mirroring from them, it might help spread the load > more (cdimage.d.o is only a P166, so cannot stand to

Re: 2.2 CD images appearing

2000-08-14 Thread Mattias Wadenstein
On 14 Aug 2000, Philip Hands wrote: > If you are running a mirror, then please use the pseudo-image-kit if > at all possible, and if it's not possible then use a mirror that has > more bandwidth (like sunsite.org.uk for example, who already have the > binary-i386-1 and 1_NONUS images available)

2.2 CD images appearing

2000-08-14 Thread Philip Hands
The 2.2 CD images are available from cdimage.debian.org. At present, I'm not happy about the alpha & sparc images, so until the images get linked to the 2.2_rev0 directory tree treat them as pre-release still. The rest seemed to build fine though, and even if the alpha or sparc CDs change, they