hello,
I purchased the 3 set debian CD's and the
configuration is a mess. I go to the configuration section after the
install and the menu locks up in the X window system Font section.
I cannot make a choice nor proceed further without
rebooting the system
-GPS
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:37:33PM +0200, Bernd Hentig wrote:
AFAIK, the only kernels worth having in either binary or source
are (in release order) 2.0.36, 2.0.17, 2.0.19, 2.4.2. All others are
You don't like *any* of the 2.2 series?
it looks like a typo to me
2.0.36, 2.2.17,
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 11:15:03AM +1000, jason andrade wrote:
have debian addressed the alleged file corruption (ext2) issue that
i heard was present in 2.4.X uptil 2.4.3 ?
Well, given that that seems to be what's been causing cdimage.debian.org
grief recently (I stupidly upgraded to 2.4.3
Previously Nate Duehr wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:37:33PM +0200, Bernd Hentig wrote:
AFAIK, the only kernels worth having in either binary or source
are (in release order) 2.0.36, 2.0.17, 2.0.19, 2.4.2.
You don't like *any* of the 2.2 series?
Considering he said `in release order'
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 11:15:03AM +1000, jason andrade wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Nate Duehr wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:37:33PM +0200, Bernd Hentig wrote:
AFAIK, the only kernels worth having in either binary or source
are (in release order) 2.0.36, 2.0.17, 2.0.19, 2.4.2. All
On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Nate Duehr wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:37:33PM +0200, Bernd Hentig wrote:
AFAIK, the only kernels worth having in either binary or source
are (in release order) 2.0.36, 2.0.17, 2.0.19, 2.4.2. All others are
You don't like *any* of the 2.2 series?
it looks like
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 10:43:03AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW open.hands.com (a.k.a. cdimage.d.o, www.uk.d.o etc.) died rather
more effectively than expected, and is no longer getting past the LILO
"Loading Linux" bit. I should be able to sort this out before the
end of today
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:37:33PM +0200, Bernd Hentig wrote:
AFAIK, the only kernels worth having in either binary or source
are (in release order) 2.0.36, 2.0.17, 2.0.19, 2.4.2. All others are
either junk and pretty unstable or useless (at least IMHO).
So, I've never really seen any use in
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Le Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:16:11AM +0200, Martin Schulze écrivait:
Also - is there any chance that .iso images or pseudo image
configurations could be ready _before_ the release is announced - eg
tonight cdimage.debian.org still has no idea
"J.A. Bezemer" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry for having been this silent. In the past few days I've spent
many hours on getting debian-cd ready for 2.2 rev3 (issues you
mentioned, updated/ redesigned README (matching www.d.o but actually
better code) and the long-promised
On 19 Apr 2001, Philip Hands wrote:
"J.A. Bezemer" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry for having been this silent. In the past few days I've spent
many hours on getting debian-cd ready for 2.2 rev3 (issues you
mentioned, updated/ redesigned README (matching www.d.o but actually
better
11 matches
Mail list logo
