Le dimanche 28 novembre 2004 à 22:48 +0100, Santiago Garcia Mantinan a
écrit :
Proably because there are no udebs at all, let alone kernel udebs, on
the second CD. So I'm reassigning this to debian-cd; if the second full
CD is intended to be bootable, it needs to have the d-i udebs on it.
Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
Proably because there are no udebs at all, let alone kernel udebs, on
the second CD. So I'm reassigning this to debian-cd; if the second full
CD is intended to be bootable, it needs to have the d-i udebs on it.
:-??? Does this seem reasonable? I mean, isn't
Proably because there are no udebs at all, let alone kernel udebs, on
the second CD. So I'm reassigning this to debian-cd; if the second full
CD is intended to be bootable, it needs to have the d-i udebs on it.
:-??? Does this seem reasonable? I mean, isn't it more reasonable to inform
the
reassign 283137 debian-cd
thanks
Margarita Manterola wrote:
This report was done with RC2 CDs, downloaded via bittorrent
Known by my will to do weird things, this time I tried booting from the
second CD, instead of the first. It listed only linux and expert as
booting methods, so I chose
4 matches
Mail list logo
