Re: Bug#704748: Not a practical issue (could even be considered a feature...:-))

2013-04-14 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 14/04/13 11:03, Christian PERRIER wrote: > As a consequence, having the desktop-gnome task broken on kFreeBSD > because of the dependency on n-m-gnome can be considered as non > release critical... Just for the record, I'm not happy about this. Why could this not have been fixed in any case, i

Re: Bug#704748: Not a practical issue (could even be considered a feature...:-))

2013-04-14 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 14.04.2013 20:56, schrieb Steven Chamberlain: > On 14/04/13 11:03, Christian PERRIER wrote: >> As a consequence, having the desktop-gnome task broken on kFreeBSD >> because of the dependency on n-m-gnome can be considered as non >> release critical... > > Just for the record, I'm not happy abou

Re: Bug#704748: Not a practical issue (could even be considered a feature...:-))

2013-04-14 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Steven Chamberlain (ste...@pyro.eu.org): > On 14/04/13 11:03, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > As a consequence, having the desktop-gnome task broken on kFreeBSD > > because of the dependency on n-m-gnome can be considered as non > > release critical... > > Just for the record, I'm not happy a

Re: Bug#704748: Not a practical issue (could even be considered a feature...:-))

2013-04-15 Thread Steven Chamberlain
For all the problems OdyX mentioned from testing, I've found a single cause and filed bug #705435. I've updated this page to demonstrate a functioning GNOME desktop on GNU/kFreeBSD: https://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD_Desktop#Wheezy_GNOME On 15/04/13 05:53, Christian PERRIER wrote: > I wa

Re: Bug#704748: Not a practical issue (could even be considered a feature...:-))

2013-04-15 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Steven Chamberlain (15/04/2013): > For all the problems OdyX mentioned from testing, I've found a single > cause and filed bug #705435. I've updated this page to demonstrate a > functioning GNOME desktop on GNU/kFreeBSD: > https://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD_Desktop#Wheezy_GNOME > > On 1

Re: Bug#704748: Not a practical issue (could even be considered a feature...:-))

2013-04-15 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 15/04/13 11:14, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > But you should have made it clear when I asked. I thought I made it > clear I needed feedback, and I wrote “*right now*”. I replied to your mail same day and used the words 'should work'... > For unrelated reasons, d-i will need a new upload, so I can u

Re: Bug#704748: Not a practical issue (could even be considered a feature...:-))

2013-04-15 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:23:09AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: >On 15/04/13 11:14, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> But you should have made it clear when I asked. I thought I made it >> clear I needed feedback, and I wrote “*right now*”. > >I replied to your mail same day and used the words 'should

Re: Bug#704748: Not a practical issue (could even be considered a feature...:-))

2013-04-15 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Steven Chamberlain (15/04/2013): > I replied to your mail same day and used the words 'should work'... Well, maybe that's just me, but that “should work” is no certainty at all, nobody says “works for me” (quite the contrary, given Didier's feedback after that). This “should work” was also drown

Re: Bug#704748: Not a practical issue (could even be considered a feature...:-))

2013-04-15 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 15.04.2013 12:14, schrieb Cyril Brulebois: > For unrelated reasons, d-i will need a new upload, so I can update > tasksel today as well, before rc2 images get built again. I don't want to sound like a broken record, but seeing that network-manager-gnome in task-gnome-desktop was demoted to Reco

Re: Bug#704748: Not a practical issue (could even be considered a feature...:-))

2013-04-16 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 16/04/13 01:49, Michael Biebl wrote: > The recommends is pointless, task-gnome-desktop depends on gnome-core > which already has a Recommends on network-manager-gnome. That is probably true but it is not going to cause harm by staying there? So it may as well stay now and can be removed post-w