Re: DOS compatible again? 8+3 names broken due to mkisofs option

2004-10-26 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 11:51:01PM +0200, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote: But I definitely think it is of no sense on i386, here it doesn't provide anything (we already have long names through joliet) and it breaks compatibility with the old DOS based systems. So, I'm for removing this -l option

DOS compatible again? 8+3 names broken due to mkisofs option

2004-10-21 Thread Santiago Garcia Mantinan
Hi! While trying to make our cds compatible with DOS again we have identified several problems, the last one is that we are generating duplicate 8+3 names, which means that some files on the cds aren't accesible to DOS. The problem with this is that we are using the -l option in our mkisofs