Re: Jigdo needs concept work

At 10:56 AM 12/2/2002 -0800, Gordon Huff wrote: I for one am looking forward to your efforts in this field. I have tried to understand how to write for Windows Sockets but it was way too complicated for me. None of the available calls did anything resembling something useful. Then I tried so

Re: Jigdo needs concept work

At 10:56 AM 12/2/2002 -0800, Gordon Huff wrote: I for one am looking forward to your efforts in this field. I have tried to understand how to write for Windows Sockets but it was way too complicated for me. None of the available calls did anything resembling something useful. Then I trie

Re: Jigdo needs concept work

At 11:49 AM 02/12/02 -0500, Chris Severance wrote: A proper implementation of Jigdo: 1. It is a GUI program, not a CLI program. Jigdo was one mans' vision ; since you're a "Windows man" and not a "*nix buf", perhaps you could do this for the Debian community (:^) Perhaps you could finish this

Re: Jigdo needs concept work

Hi Chris, thanks for your suggestions! Actually, I did all the "concept work" long ago, but then ran into problems finding the time to turn concepts into fact... ;) On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:49:42AM -0500, Chris Severance wrote: > 1. It is a GUI program, not a CLI program. Yes! This is planned

Jigdo needs concept work

A proper implementation of Jigdo: 1. It is a GUI program, not a CLI program. 2. Jigdo only asks for a single link. The information at this link maintained by the head of the system, in this case some link advertised at debian download page. "Provide this _link_ when jigdo asks for your online d