Otto Wyss wrote:
> I'm just gone through a new Debian installation process and think I know
> a little bit what's wrong.
>
> 1. The current stable release (3.0r1) is just outdated.
> 2. There are way too many show stoppers in the testing release (3.1)
> installation
>
> 1. takes care that (almost
Otto Wyss wrote:
> I'm just gone through a new Debian installation process and think I know
> a little bit what's wrong.
>
> 1. The current stable release (3.0r1) is just outdated.
> 2. There are way too many show stoppers in the testing release (3.1)
> installation
>
> 1. takes care that (almost
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes:
> I'm just gone through a new Debian installation process and think I know
> a little bit what's wrong.
>
> 1. The current stable release (3.0r1) is just outdated.
> 2. There are way too many show stoppers in the testing release (3.1)
> installation
>
> 1. t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes:
> I'm just gone through a new Debian installation process and think I know
> a little bit what's wrong.
>
> 1. The current stable release (3.0r1) is just outdated.
> 2. There are way too many show stoppers in the testing release (3.1)
> installation
>
> 1. t
I'm just gone through a new Debian installation process and think I know
a little bit what's wrong.
1. The current stable release (3.0r1) is just outdated.
2. There are way too many show stoppers in the testing release (3.1)
installation
1. takes care that (almost) nobody uses Debian/stable for n
I'm just gone through a new Debian installation process and think I know
a little bit what's wrong.
1. The current stable release (3.0r1) is just outdated.
2. There are way too many show stoppers in the testing release (3.1)
installation
1. takes care that (almost) nobody uses Debian/stable for n
6 matches
Mail list logo
