On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 12:25:50PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2015-03-05):
We've had this discussion befire, surely? On pettersson we rsync
things (over ssh) directly from d-i.d.o (dillon), so we don't depend
on http or git. Or am I missing something new?
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:51:46PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Ian Campbell i...@debian.org (2015-03-05):
I think the ABI only guarantees you can load old modules into a newer
vmlinuz. In particular I think it doesn't guarantee that you can load
newer modules into an older vmlinuz (even if
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2015-03-08):
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:51:46PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Thinking a bit more about this: I think having weekly testing with
everything from testing makes the most sense.
OK... Are we going to do more frequent d-i uploads to make sure
Ian Campbell i...@debian.org (2015-03-05):
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 12:25 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
OK. Assuming amd64 is working OK, I should check the rsync has not
broken - that seems to be the most likely cause right now. Thinking:
it would also be lovely to verify the versions of
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 12:25 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
OK. Assuming amd64 is working OK, I should check the rsync has not
broken - that seems to be the most likely cause right now. Thinking:
it would also be lovely to verify the versions of vmlinuz and the
kernel udebs in debian-cd at
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2015-03-05):
[ Writing this off-line again while travelling so I can't check things
directly on pettersson etc. ]
ACK.
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:47:12PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2015-03-03):
Hmmm. That's very odd.
[ Writing this off-line again while travelling so I can't check things
directly on pettersson etc. ]
Hi KiBi,
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:47:12PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2015-03-03):
Hmmm. That's very odd. The weekly builds are currently set up to use
Hi KiBi,
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 05:25:11AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Package: debian-cd
Severity: important
Hi,
it's been reported to me that debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso[1] was
broken, in that it features d-i using an “old” kernel (3.16.7-ckt4-3),
but kernel udebs apparently from sid,
Hi,
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2015-03-03):
Hmmm. That's very odd. The weekly builds are currently set up to use
daily d-i builds rather than what's in the archive, and they've been
that way for a long time.
I don't think that's a good idea. For one thing, there's no trust chain
here
Package: debian-cd
Severity: important
Hi,
it's been reported to me that debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso[1] was
broken, in that it features d-i using an “old” kernel (3.16.7-ckt4-3),
but kernel udebs apparently from sid, as can be seen in the list
file[2]: they're at version 3.16.7-ckt7-1.
1.
Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:04:47 +
with message-id 20100221230447.gw1...@einval.com
and subject line Re: Bug#569632: debian-cd: broken isolinux configuration
has caused the Debian Bug report #569632,
regarding debian-cd: broken isolinux configuration
to be marked as done
when generating a squeeze CD, the isolinux configuration still
contains
templates so that the boot prompt line contains things such as:
/%install%/vmlinuz ... desktop=%desktop% ... initrd=/%install%/initrd.gz
...
+1
This problem with debian-cd persists for amd configuration as well..
--
Package: debian-cd
Version: 3.1.2
Severity: important
when generating a squeeze CD, the isolinux configuration still contains
templates so that the boot prompt line contains things such as:
/%install%/vmlinuz ... desktop=%desktop% ... initrd=/%install%/initrd.gz ...
with the debian-cd version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all!
I had problems building sarge cd images from my local mirror
yesterday and today. I didn't change anything and used the latest
cvs version of debian-cd.
Both
make distclean
make mirror_check
are running normal without any messages. But
Quoting Jan Kesten:
I had problems building sarge cd images from my local mirror
yesterday and today. I didn't change anything and used the latest
cvs version of debian-cd.
Can you show the CONF.sh file that you're using ?
It looks like there's a problem with your EXCLUDE variable ... in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi Raphael!
Can you show the CONF.sh file that you're using ?
Of course, I attached it :-)
It looks like there's a problem with your EXCLUDE variable ... in the
As I remeber I didn't set one at all - perhaps this is the
Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
otavio is responsible for that change, maybe he can sort it out ? :)
I bet that we could replace -n with -e and have a better test. Or we
should at least add quotes around $(EXCLUDE) in the test itself.
I changed it already. Please can you and Jan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Otavio Salvador wrote:
I changed it already. Please can you and Jan check if works now?
I tried to change this here too, and it seems to work now - if the run
completes I'll let you know. Thank you for looking!
Cheers,
Jan
- --
GPG-KeyID: 82201FC4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jan Kesten wrote:
I changed it already. Please can you and Jan check if works now?
I tried seems very good - thanks again!
Was there anything changed recently at this point, because it worked a
long time?
Cheers,
Jan
- --
GPG-KeyID: 82201FC4
Jan Kesten [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I tried seems very good - thanks again!
Good.
Was there anything changed recently at this point, because it worked a
long time?
I've included the possibility to pre-process the exclude file like was
did in task. So, you exclude can include another files,
20 matches
Mail list logo
