Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 18:51:36 +0200
Source: sbcl
Architecture: source
Version: 2:2.0.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team
Changed-By: Sébastien Villemot
Closes: 939453 954031
sbcl_2.0.3-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
sbcl_2.0.3-1.dsc
sbcl_2.0.3.orig.tar.bz2
sbcl_2.0.3-1.debian.tar.xz
sbcl_2.0.3-1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Your message dated Wed, 01 Apr 2020 18:34:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#955338: fixed in sbcl 2:2.0.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #955338,
regarding sbcl: Please backport patch to fix build on kfreebsd-*
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Wed, 01 Apr 2020 18:34:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#954031: fixed in sbcl 2:2.0.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #954031,
regarding sbcl: Please allow building with clisp on currently unsupported
architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Wed, 01 Apr 2020 18:34:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#939453: fixed in sbcl 2:2.0.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #939453,
regarding sbcl: Please pass host architecture explicitly when calling make.sh
in debian/rules
to be marked as done.
This means that
(Switched back to my main address, accidentally switched to GMail)
On 4/1/20 5:05 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> So, the currently only candidate for this scenario is mipsel and I think this
>> is a risk that is bearable, in particular since upstream considers 32-bit
>> mips
>> one of the
Le mercredi 01 avril 2020 à 16:56 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 4/1/20 4:51 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > > FWIW, sbcl builds fine for me on mipsel if clang is used as the C
> > > compiler,
> > > I'll file a separate bug report for that.
> >
> > I have mixed feelings about
Hi!
On 4/1/20 4:51 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> FWIW, sbcl builds fine for me on mipsel if clang is used as the C compiler,
>> I'll file a separate bug report for that.
>
> I have mixed feelings about this. I am worried by the fact that those
> architectures are not really supported
Hi,
Le mercredi 01 avril 2020 à 16:43 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 3/16/20 1:16 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > sbcl has partial support for alpha, hppa, mips*, ppc64 and riscv64
> > and if we try to build sbcl on any architecture using clisp, we will
> > be able to
Hi!
On 3/16/20 1:16 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> sbcl has partial support for alpha, hppa, mips*, ppc64 and riscv64
> and if we try to build sbcl on any architecture using clisp, we will
> be able to provide upstream with a build log of sbcl on any architecture
> that might be supported
Hi Sébastien!
On 9/14/19 4:43 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> I was just trying to build sbcl for ppc64 on a powerpc Debian with a ppc64
>> chroot and noticed that the build set the compiler architecture to "ppc"
>> during build.
>
> It looks like this particular case is somehow expected. See
11 matches
Mail list logo
