Hi all,
Le vendredi 25 mars 2022 à 17:09 +0100, Sébastien Villemot a écrit :
> For the last couple of years, I’ve been the most active member of the
> Debian Common Lisp Team. However, it’s becoming increasingly clear that
> my involvement is now going to be significantly reduced (lac
Le samedi 13 mai 2023 à 04:45 -0400, Michael P. Soulier a écrit :
> On 13/05/23 Sébastien Villemot said:
>
> > Indeed it looks like the recommendation to use “sbcl --script …” is
> > incorrect, since SBCL terminates after loading the file, without giving
> > access to a R
from which you could do the installation.
You should follow the other installation option given in the same
README file, which is to use (load #p"/usr/share/common-
lisp/source/quicklisp/quicklisp.lisp") in the REPL before running
(quicklisp-quickstart:install).
Best regards,
--
itecture,
or autopkgtest failures of reverse dependencies. You can monitor the
status on the tracker page (which is not refreshed instantly, maybe
every 24h at most):
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/sbcl
Cheers,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.vill
Hi Sean,
Le mercredi 06 avril 2022 à 12:24 -0700, Sean Whitton a écrit :
> On Mon 28 Mar 2022 at 03:45PM +02, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>
> > For team members:
> > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianCommonLisp
> > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianCommonLisp/GitPackagi
from that side.
>
> And calling uname -m in a running Docker image seems to always report
> the host architecture.
>
> Awaiting your decision regarding SBCL_ARCH.
Your i386 change looks reasonable to me, and it should not break
anything.
But I’m not the one who’s going t
-/jobs/2641145#L1579
>
> Any hint how to continue?
I would not change the i386 sbcl build for now. It has always worked
fine on Debian build daemons, which is what truly matters.
I think I would first contact the maintainers of the Salsa CI runners
to understand why “uname -m” reports x86_64 ins
we have the possibility of installing the sbcl-source package
> which was built during the previous pipeline build stage?
Yes, you just have to add sbcl-source to the Depends field in
debian/tests/control.
Cheers,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄ https://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Best wishes,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄ https://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ed. Ideally, when you’re
requesting sponsorship, you should let the sponsor add the debian/*
tag.
P.S. #2: Don’t feel obliged to do a very formal RFS like you just did.
An informal request by email should be enough.
Thanks for your work,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀
Hi Christoph,
(I’m CCing you, I don’t know whether you are subscribed to the list).
Le jeudi 31 mars 2022 à 22:22 +0200, Christoph Berg a écrit :
> Re: Sébastien Villemot
> > Other tasks include: dealing with the regular updates of CL libraries;
>
> I just uploaded a new version
s is different, and causes the incorrect
detection.
I would therefore ignore this problem for the time being, try an
upload, and see whether the package builds on i386 build daemons. If it
does, then the problem is specific to the CI runners (in which case it
could make sense to investigate w
e I also read up on sbuild.
pbuilder is indeed a good option, easy to install. You may optionally
want to setup another environment for running autopkgtests.
Alternatively, it’s possible to have autopkgtests (and lintian,
piuparts, reprotest…) run automatically on salsa.debian.org at every
git p
iki.debian.org/sbuild). I don’t know how familiar
you are with Debian packaging, but if you need pointers, just ask.
Also note that, when you’re ready, you should push your changes to the
team repository (and not your personal one). And since my understanding
is that you don’t have upload rights to t
Hi again,
As a reminder, here are the three wiki pages that are maintained by the
team:
For users:
https://wiki.debian.org/CommonLisp
For team members:
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianCommonLisp
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianCommonLisp/GitPackaging
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
to
> modify the Lisp image at build time (though the latter is obviously
> better).
I will start by looking into this.
Great, thanks!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄ https://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Le lundi 28 mars 2022 à 15:26 +0200, Sébastien Villemot a écrit :
>
> Indeed the main work is to maintain implementations that I have been
> maintaining recently: SBCL of course, CLISP (barely active), ABCL (new
> in Debian, so hard to tell the amount of work). ECL on the other han
Le samedi 26 mars 2022 à 09:59 -0700, Sean Whitton a écrit :
> On Fri 25 Mar 2022 at 05:09pm +01, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>
> > For the last couple of years, I’ve been the most active member of the
> > Debian Common Lisp Team. However, it’s becoming increasingly clear that
packages; finally getting rid of dh-lisp (which does nothing useful).
Cheers,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄ https://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
), but that needs to be
confirmed:
https://www.reddit.com/r/lisp/comments/rmbq0f/sbcl_2111_gives_internal_error_222_nil_argsnil/
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄ https://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Dear David,
Le vendredi 03 décembre 2021 à 14:27 -0600, David Loyall a écrit :
Package: sbcl
Version: 2:2.1.11-1
Severity: important
Dear Sébastien Villemot,
Here is some output from a terminal:
sebboh@debian:~/prj$ sbcl --load quicklisp.lisp
This is SBCL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sébastien Villemot
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-common-lisp@lists.debian.org
Control: block 995846 by -1
* Package name: cl-global-vars
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : James M. Lawrence
* URL : https
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sébastien Villemot
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-common-lisp@lists.debian.org
Control: block 995846 by -1
* Package name: cl-uax-15
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Takeru Ohta, Sabra Crolleton
* URL
y
³ https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pgloader
⁴ https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/buildapp
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄ https://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
.
Best,
¹ For more details on Common Lisp and Debian, see
https://wiki.debian.org/CommonLisp
² https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/xindy
³ https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pgloader
⁴ https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/buildapp
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https
lisp, which is now
useless)
— move to Debian Common Lisp Team maintenance, and host the packaging code on
Salsa
— add an autopkgtest that runs the testsuite of the package on sbcl and ecl
— and various other usual Debian maintenance tasks
See https://salsa.debian.org/common-lisp-team/cl-nibbles
Be
be happy to help.
Best,
¹ https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianCommonLisp
² https://wiki.debian.org/CommonLisp
³ https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=dim%40tapoueh.org
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄ https://www.d
abled tests on Ubuntu.
Best,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄ https://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
an replicate this problem with sbcl 2:2.0.5-1, but not with sbcl
2:2.0.6-2.
Can you confirm that the latest sbcl upload fixes it for you too?
Best,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄ https://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Le mercredi 01 avril 2020 à 16:56 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 4/1/20 4:51 PM, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > > FWIW, sbcl builds fine for me on mipsel if clang is used as the C
> > > compiler,
> > > I'll file a separate bug report for that.
> &
ng migration for
supported archs.
What’s your view on this?
Best,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄ https://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
patch for this issue.
Note that this issue had already been fixed in Debian. It looks like
sbcl in Ubuntu is out-of-sync.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄ http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear ftpmasters,
Please remove common-lisp-controller. It is obsolete, and did not ship with
buster (see #913649).
Best,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄ http://www.debian.org
tand why there is such a strange mapping, but at
least your problem does not come from the Debian packaging.
> In order to make sure the proper host architecture is used during build,
> the debian/rules file should pass the proper host architecture during
> build to the make
ackage should be removed as the build is blocked by the missing bootstrapped
> sbcl package on the buildds anyway.
Ok, noted.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄ http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
t runtime. Hence both the source and the binary package need
to depend on it.
Best,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄ http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
atter case, please fix
> your autopkgtest or mark this particular test as flaky.
I think I'll mark it as flaky, since clisp is a second-tier and under-
maintained Common Lisp implementation.
Do you think it is worth making this change now, given that I'll have
to ask for an unblock?
Be
Dear Ivo,
Le samedi 12 janvier 2019 à 15:51 +0100, Ivo De Decker a écrit :
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 03:42:02PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > common-lisp-controller is obsolete, and should not ship with
> > buster. It has
> > been superseded by ASDF.
>
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sébastien Villemot
* Package name: cl-named-readtables
Version : 20180121.git985b162
Upstream Author : Gábor Melis
* URL : https://github.com/melisgl/named-readtables
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Common
Package: common-lisp-controller
Version: 7.11
Severity: serious
common-lisp-controller is obsolete, and should not ship with buster. It has
been superseded by ASDF.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄ http://www.debian.org
implementations in Debian.
Dropping the dependency should be enough. ASDF is able to locate the files
where they are installed (i.e. under /usr/share/common-lisp/).
The severity of this bug report may be raised before the Buster freeze.
Best,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
implementations in Debian.
Dropping the dependency should be enough. ASDF is able to locate the files
where they are installed (i.e. under /usr/share/common-lisp/).
The severity of this bug report may be raised before the Buster freeze.
Best,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
reciated.
As you may have noticed, the hol88 package in Debian is not maintained by the
Debian Common Lisp Team, but by Camm Maguire (in CC).
He is the one who can take the decision of introducing a separate hol88 binary
package (probably out of the same source package), compiled with SBCL.
Best,
--
n the Debian Common Lisp Team. It is a new
dependency of cl-fiveam, and is needed for fixing #865952.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄ http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 07:00:10PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> please mention
> libfixposix-0.4.3/src/tests/lib/LICENSE
> in your debian/copyright.
Thanks for caring. Reuploaded with the missing copyright information.
Best,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian
Package: cl-babel
Version: 20171213.git546fa82-1
Severity: wishlist
The autopkgtest currently only loads the ASDF systems (babel and babel-streams).
It should also exercise the testsuite in the babel-tests system, but this first
requires hu.dwim.stefil to be packaged.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄ http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
47 matches
Mail list logo
