Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

2004-04-26 Thread Raul Miller
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 02:15:01AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: Dear technical ctte, if you are able to come to a conclusion on this topic, please make a decision as to whether the social contract requires non-free documentation, firmware, etc to be removed from main before release. So...

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

2004-04-26 Thread Raul Miller
[Note: I've removed aj from the explicit followups to honor the Mail-Followup-To: headers on his message.] On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 02:52:27AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: The key questions to my mind are: * are there any other possible release policies on this issue (than delay

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

2004-04-26 Thread Raul Miller
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 02:15:01AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: Dear technical ctte, if you are able to come to a conclusion on this topic, please make a decision as to whether the social contract requires non-free documentation, firmware, etc to be removed from main before release. Do you

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

2004-04-26 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 02:56:09PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 07:28:11PM -0500, Debian Project Secretary wrote: At this point, with 244 ballots resulting in 216 votes from 214 developers, Choice 1: Change the Social Contract [3:1 majority needed] has

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge

2004-04-26 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 11:23:51 -0400, Theodore Ts'o [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: You forgot one other thing. We'll also have to strip **ALL** **FONTS** from Debian, since fonts come in binary form, and we don't have anything approaching the preferred form for modification for fonts. In