Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 307833 tech-ctte
Bug#307833: apt-file: broken. curl is needed
Bug#311329: apt-file depends IMHO on curl
Bug#323970: apt-file should depend on curl
Bug#324153: apt-file depends on curl which is not mentioned
Bug#325102: apt-file should depend on
Anthony Towns writes (Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main):
After the discussions so far, I'm inclined towards the following two views
of our policy on this:
* first, that dependencies are one way -- programs depend on
libraries, but libraries don't depend on the programs that use
I've taken a look at the bug logs and I'm very disappointed with the
maintainer's lack of engagement. There seem to be a lot of people who
are interested in helping maintain this package.
Would any of the keen people we see involved in this bug report
consider contesting the maintainership of
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Ian Jackson wrote:
What, then, is the intended meaning when the policy manual talks about
`wrappers' for non-free programs ? (Feel free to say that the wording
is suboptimal and shouldn't be read so closely.)
Wrapper like installation wrappers: free code that downloads a
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:14:22AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
Anthony Towns writes (Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main):
After the discussions so far, I'm inclined towards the following two views
of our policy on this:
* first, that dependencies are one way -- programs depend on
Raphael Hertzog writes (Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main):
What's so different between my own non-free program and my own non-free
card which requires a non-free driver to work with ?
You didn't make the card.
(Unless you want to argue that ndiswrapper is for helping hardware
developers
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Raul Miller wrote:
On 2/28/06, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Raul Miller wrote:
On 2/28/06, Raphael Hertzog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's so different between my own non-free program and my own non-free
card which requires a
7 matches
Mail list logo