On 6 Mar 2006, Anthony Towns said:
> Either way, I propose the following, call for a vote on it, and vote
> in favour:
>
> WHEREAS
>
> 1. The committee has been asked by Robert Millan, the submitter of
> Bug#353278 and a former developer, to overrule the decision by the
> maintainer of the ndiswr
Okay, so here's the alternate proposal. I understand Raul at least
disagrees with paragraph (3) (and obviously the conclusions based on
that), but I'm not sure we have any good way of noting that difference
of opinion -- perhaps we should include the previous draft in the vote?
Courts and parliamen
2 matches
Mail list logo
