On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:00:50AM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
When ide-generic is included (it is loaded after all the native ide
modules), the kernel boots fine. The reason is that in the Debian
2.6.8 sources the ide-generic initialization procedure contains the
call to ide_scan_pcibus(),
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:12:42AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:00:50AM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
When ide-generic is included (it is loaded after all the native ide
modules), the kernel boots fine. The reason is that in the Debian
2.6.8 sources the ide-generic
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 08:10:12AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
I've done a little poking of my own at sysfs based on the comments in
the yaird code. I can confirm that it is possible for a PCI IDE driver
to be listed as associated with a PCI device without actually being the
driver used to
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:40:26AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 08:10:12AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
I've done a little poking of my own at sysfs based on the comments in
the yaird code. I can confirm that it is possible for a PCI IDE driver
to be listed as
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:49:18AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Mmm. When this was happening, could you use and mount partition on this
device ?
And when doing so, do you know which of ide-generic or cmd64x would be
used to
read the drive ?
Are you suggesting that loading cmd64x
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 01:10:27AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 09:49:18AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
Mmm. When this was happening, could you use and mount partition on this
device ?
And when doing so, do you know which of ide-generic or cmd64x would be
Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au writes:
So, it seems like we have the following opinions:
In the long term, have fine grained control that leaves disks as
root:disk 0660, and other devices with other appropriate groups.
-- in favour: everyone?
Immediately, until the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(Looks like the two days rest is getting irrelevant...)
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:00:50 -0800 (PST)
Jurij Smakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
What version of the kernel was this analysis done with? The
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:28:07PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
That patch has been dropped starting with the release of 2.6.15-1
Debian kernel packages, according to changelog.
Yes. It is also noted as being dropped in 2.6.14-6.
The first of my collected[1] Bugreports[2] indicated
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:07:34 +0100
Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 10 March 2006 15:29, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
If modular-ide is the sole source of trouble here, then what worked
in 2.6.14-4 and earlier?
=2.6.12 used initrd-tools and that must still contain the correct
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
If modular-ide is the sole source of trouble here, then what worked in
2.6.14-4 and earlier?
The bugreports seem to indicate that things broke in 2.6.14-5 that
worked in 2.6.14-4. And it seems nothing related else than linux-2.6
changed then - not
11 matches
Mail list logo
