Bug#367709: Call for vote: gcc: requesting libstdc++.udeb

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bdale Garbee) writes: - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- [ 3 ] Choice 1: a libstdc++ udeb should be created as per bug #367709 [ 1 ] Choice 2: a libstdc++ udeb should not be created despite bug #367709 [ 2 ] Choice 3: Further

Re: Bug#367709: Call for vote: gcc: requesting libstdc++.udeb

On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:09:46AM +0100, Bdale Garbee wrote: The udeb structure was invented for debian-installer, and to date Debian has not supported the use of udebs for any other purpose. (With ftpmaster hat: I would expect non d-i uses of udebs to be in a different section of the archive

Bug#367709: marked as done (requesting libstdc++ .udeb in order to produce c++ based images based on d-i technology (but not d-i).)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:56:10 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#367709: Call for vote: gcc: requesting libstdc++.udeb has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Re: Bug#367709: Call for vote: gcc: requesting libstdc++.udeb

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bdale Garbee) writes: I hereby call for an immediate TC vote on the question of whether a libstdc++ udeb should be created to support the use of C++ in the debian-installer environment, as requested by bug #367709. While I would be pleased to see responses from Ian and