reopen 607368
tags 607368 - wontfix
reassign 607368 tech-ctte
retitle 607368 Please decide how kernel ABI should be managed
thanks
Hi,
I am hereby asking the tech-ctte to decide how the kernel ABI should be
managed.
Case in point: the kernel team decided to ignore changes to the smp_ops
symbol i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 607368
Bug #607368 {Done: maximilian attems } [src:linux-2.6] linux-2.6:
silent ABI change in 2.6.32.26 breaks external modules (smp_ops changes)
> tags 607368 - wontfix
Bug #607368 [src:linux-2.6] linux-2.6: silent ABI change in 2.6.32.26
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 07:30:58PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> reopen 607368
> tags 607368 - wontfix
> reassign 607368 tech-ctte
> retitle 607368 Please decide how kernel ABI should be managed
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> I am hereby asking the tech-ctte to decide how the kernel ABI should be
> managed
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 07:30:58PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> I am hereby asking the tech-ctte to decide how the kernel ABI should
> be managed.
Hi Julien, from the bug log it's pretty clear that there was no
possibilities of agreement between you and the kernel team, so thanks
for bringing thi
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 20:19 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 07:30:58PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> > I am hereby asking the tech-ctte to decide how the kernel ABI should
> > be managed.
>
> Hi Julien, from the bug log it's pretty clear that there was no
> possibilities
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 08:19:22PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 07:30:58PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> > I am hereby asking the tech-ctte to decide how the kernel ABI should
> > be managed.
>
> Hi Julien, from the bug log it's pretty clear that there was no
> possib
6 matches
Mail list logo