Steve Langasek writes ("Re: Bug#573745: ping"):
> Do you mean that you would get a *private* ack from the current maintainer,
> but no public one?
I am assuming that we are likely to get no ack at all.
> As commented in my previous mail, I don't believe that a maintenance *team*
> can be formed w
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 12:56:34PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Do you mean that you would get a *private* ack from the current
> maintainer, but no public one? But as long as we have the current
> maintainer's agreement (in whatever form), this concern is null.
I didn't mean to imply that I ca
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 07:18:16PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Fair enough, I'll consider starting myself a discussion about a
> potential Python maintenance team on -python. It's still only a
> "consider" as the tricky part is that, for various reasons already
> mentioned in this bug log,
Stefano Zacchiroli writes ("Bug#573745: ping"):
> Let's assume for a moment (very hypothetically!) that a team can be
> found which both includes the current maintainer and has rough consensus
> on -python. Would the CTTE be willing to establish such a team as
> Python interpreter maintainers, eve
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 11:55:06AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I think, and have for some time, that the ideal situation would be a
> maintenance team that includes Matthias (assuming that Matthias still
> cares deeply about the Python packaging and wants to continue to
> participate). If such a
5 matches
Mail list logo
