Hi Roger,
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:02:52AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:14:14AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > ]] Steve Langasek
> > | 4) Turn on direct use of 'debian/rules build-arch' on the autobuilders
> > for
> > | all packages in unstable and experiment
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 01:04:00AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:02:52AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:14:14AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > > ]] Steve Langasek
> > Summarised:
> > - autodetection with "make -qn" breaks few,
* Roger Leigh , 2011-06-11, 12:19:
7) Failed autodetection
- autodetection failed to detect an existing build-arch target
- unconditional used build-arch
A complete list of packages is at the bottom; these are selected
examples.
Example: spring_0.82.7.1+dfsg1-3
In this package, the
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 01:37:05PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Roger Leigh , 2011-06-11, 12:19:
> >7) Failed autodetection
> > - autodetection failed to detect an existing build-arch target
> > - unconditional used build-arch
> > A complete list of packages is at the bottom; these are selected
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
> I would like to suggest that it may be preferable for dpkg-buildpackage
> to implement both
> - make -qn autodetection and
> - Build-Features
>
> This will permit the vast majority of packages to build using
> build-arch today, without any modification. I
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:19:47PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> (7) Packages failing due to broken autodetection
I'm afraid the query wasn't entirely correct for this one. The
real list is this:
# SELECT o.package, o.version
FROM orig AS o
INNER JOIN auto AS a
ON o.package=a.package AND o.version
(Sorry to just join this conversation; I was on holiday in Wales,
which was excellent.)
Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Request for TC to rule on a course of action for
supporting build-arch"):
> I was going to suggest that. The way I prepared the corresponding patch
> (the one you called "auto-dete
Ian Jackson writes:
> (Sorry to just join this conversation; I was on holiday in Wales,
> which was excellent.)
> Raphael Hertzog writes:
>> I was going to suggest that. The way I prepared the corresponding patch
>> (the one you called "auto-detection") already does that in fact. So the
>> few
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 09:41:18AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jun 2011, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > If this were to be put to a vote today, I would propose the following ballot
> > options:
> > 1) Implement support for calling 'debian/rules build-arch' in place of
> > 'debian/ru
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, Steve Langasek wrote:
> This actually reads to me the same as option 1. What distinction are you
> meaning to draw here? It's not very "direct" use of build-arch if we're
> checking 'make -qn' first. The only other differences I see here are
> issuing a warning, and explicit
10 matches
Mail list logo
