* Patrick Ouellette , 2012-05-04, 19:12:
(I'm assuming Jonathan Nieder is some how acting with their knowledge
or approval at some level)
Why? I wouldn't assume so.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Can anyone explain to me why the message I sent with a proposal
containing a MAJOR concession to the Node.js maintainers has not
received a response from the Node.js maintainers but rather caused them
(I'm assuming Jonathan Nieder is some how acting with their knowledge
or approval at some level) t
Hi,
* Sebastian Urbach [2012-05-04 19:20]:
[...]
> The right reaction should be to say thanks for the info and
> immediately start the work on the package update. His reaction till
> today is exactly zero.
Without commenting on anything else that you wrote, because I can't judge the
situation
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:28:04AM -0500, Steve Kostecke wrote:
>
> I've not had time to read that entire thread, but it seems to me that
> renaming well known binaries violates the Principle Of Least
> Astonishment.
>
> Has anyone considered making nodejs and ax25 conflict? That would be an
> ea
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Why?
No strong reason. The tech-ctte is free to decide any matter of
technical policy they choose to, so there's no constitutional reason
to go the way I was suggesting.
Since it sounds like you've thought about this carefully already,
I'm satisfied. Sorry for the noise.
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:38:43AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael's approach of creating a compatibility symlink in postinst during
> upgrades but not for new installs sounds better to me the more I think
> about it, since that addresses the major concern of breaking someone's
> system during
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I believe at this point the dpkg-buildflags solution has proven
>> reasonably successful and is being widely deployed. I think we should
>> confirm that the TC agrees with that approach and close out this bug.
> While I understand that the PR eff
The Fungi writes:
> I think this is part of the misunderstanding. If these systems are nodes
> on an AX.25 network, what's being renamed (and potentially broken) is
> the userspace binary which connects the machine to the network. Think of
> it as if you're suggesting a rename of /usr/sbin/sshd t
Hi Russ,
Russ Allbery wrote:
> I believe at this point the dpkg-buildflags solution has proven reasonably
> successful and is being widely deployed. I think we should confirm that
> the TC agrees with that approach and close out this bug.
While I understand that the PR effect would be good, I e
9 matches
Mail list logo
