Bug#700759: Shared library policy on private libs

2013-02-20 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Guillem" == Guillem Jover writes: Guillem> On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 20:30:48 -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: >> with the current packaging tools, you tend to end up producing >> the .shlibs files in order to manage cross-package dependencies >> within a single source package. If it

Bug#698556: Please override isdnutils maintainer's decision to not fix the broken isdnutils package in wheezy

2013-02-20 Thread Christoph Biedl
Bdale Garbee wrote... > Adding a dependency on makedev will work, but since the makedev package > is long orphaned and there's rarely any reason to have it installed any > more, I personally wonder if it wouldn't be better to just add > appropriate mknod calls directly? With all respect, I disagr

Bug#698556: Please override isdnutils maintainer's decision to not fix the broken isdnutils package in wheezy

2013-02-20 Thread Bdale Garbee
Christoph Biedl writes: >> Adding a dependency on makedev will work, but since the makedev package >> is long orphaned and there's rarely any reason to have it installed any >> more, I personally wonder if it wouldn't be better to just add >> appropriate mknod calls directly? > > With all respect

Bug#698556: Please override isdnutils maintainer's decision to not fix the broken isdnutils package in wheezy

2013-02-20 Thread Andreas Barth
* Bdale Garbee (bd...@gag.com) [130221 07:07]: > Christoph Biedl writes: > > >> Adding a dependency on makedev will work, but since the makedev package > >> is long orphaned and there's rarely any reason to have it installed any > >> more, I personally wonder if it wouldn't be better to just add